RFPIO Pricing, Features, Reviews and Alternatives

RFI, RFPs, Security docs can now be answered effortlessly with collaboration across teams, ease of exporting in same font and space, answer library and docs library, with excellent customer support.

It took some time, now I mean real few months to understand how this works. (Once after that, no more worries, breeze through all your work and turn it back in before you know!)

Thank you, Hariprasad! Glad to hear that you've gotten up to speed with the tool and are collaborating effortlessly! We love working with Informatica and look forward to a continued relationship. Stay tuned for our next user conference. :)

I think that RFPio does a phenomenal job of allowing us to import our RFPs and to keep an up-to-date library of our most common answers. It's a great way to centralize our processes.

I think the import tool and the options for declaring entries (description, section, question, sub question, etc) can be a bit confusing. That said, I didn't go through an official training on the system, and inherited it from someone who inherited it. I think the concern is more with my organization, but I do think there are improvements that can be made to the import area in particular. Especially, for example, if there is a table built within a larger PDF document.

Thanks so much, Kyle! We have training materials available within the RFPIO Help Center that could help with some of the areas of confusion. Hope that's helpful. Thanks again. We appreciate the high marks and thoughtful comments!

What I like most about RFPIO is the ability to store content and knowledge in sections and answer format. Once populated with verified content, it reduces the resources required to compile a standard proposal and the author and reviewer functions streamline team contributions. Custom merge fields, categories, keywords, etc. offer a lot of flexibility over how you organize and retrieve your content.

Although RFPIO is a great resource for storing and organizing content and knowledge, it's limited control over the formatting of the content means that exporting proposals through multiple iterations can be time consuming. Word templates do a decent job of providing a base look and feel but working with things such as line spacing, tables, etc. is finicky and image quality from RFPIO to Word document to PDF can result in poor end quality. Once I have compiled the bulk of the project and exported to Word, I tend to continue with Word and then am forced to go back and update any content changes in RFPIO to reflect the final results. It is not efficient to make changes and re-export each time.

Ease of use, project management, team collaboration, suitable pricing model.

WORD template management needs improvement.

Thanks so much for your review! Sounds like you are using RFPIO to its full advantage. We will share your feedback with the team!

No pros were added to this review

No cons were added to this review

Tess, thank you for your kind review. We are so happy to hear so many positive effects, including helping with the sanity factor. Wonderful to have Taskstream as our partners!