App comparison

Add up to 4 apps below to see how they compare. You can also use the "Compare" buttons while browsing.

Glue Logo
Glue

Customer loyalty software designed for local businesses

visit website

Glue Features

Features Summary

Functionality

5.0

/5

3

Total features

76

6 categories

Glue features

API
Access Controls/Permissions
Activity Dashboard
Activity Tracking
Alerts/Notifications
Application Management
Appointment Management
Appointment Scheduling

Common features of Customer Loyalty software

API
Activity Dashboard
Activity Tracking
CRM
Campaign Analytics
Campaign Management
Campaign Planning
Campaign Segmentation

Price starts from

ic-pricetag

No pricing info

Pricing options
Free plan
Subscription
Free trial

Screenshots

Contenders comparison

Functionality

5.0

/5

3

Price starts from

ic-pricetag

No pricing info

visit website

Total Features

76

Unique features

  • Campaign Analytics

  • Client Profiles

  • Customer Segmentation

  • Campaign Planning

Functionality

4.7

/5

973

Price starts from

499

/user

Per year

learn more

Total Features

21

Features in Common

8

Unique features

  • Version Control

  • Custom Development

  • Integrated Development Environment

  • Source Control

Functionality

4.5

/5

1.4K

Price starts from

Free

learn more

Total Features

3

Features in Common

0

Unique features

  • Historical Reporting

  • Custom Development

  • Search/Filter

Common Glue comparisons

Glue logo
TapMango logo
GluevsTapMango
Glue logo
RepeatRewards logo
GluevsRepeatRewards
Glue logo
Kangaroo logo
GluevsKangaroo
Glue logo
FiveStars logo
GluevsFiveStars
Glue logo
Apex Loyalty logo
GluevsApex Loyalty

Reviewers who mentioned features said:

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend8/10

Share this review:

You build great mobile apps with no any coding skill

Reviewed 4 years ago

The team of Bobile was very helpful from the beginning of our collaboration. I recommend this software to marketers with no any coding skills in order to build mobile apps with great functionality for their clients. Also, it will be a great alternative for marketing agencies or web development agencies to build really quick mobile apps for clients with a certain budget. All of my clients are very satisfied with the apps that I have created for them.

Pros

The software is user frendly with great functionality. I own a digital agency as well and I have created several apps especially in beauty, healthcare, medical, fitness industry but it works really great in every industry.

Cons

I have nothing to add here because I am satisfied 100%.

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend10/10

Share this review:

Company Name Projility Inc. Full-time

Reviewed a year ago

AWS Glue studio allows ETL developers and data engineers to visually develop, run, and monitor the ETL workflows. AWS Glue DataBrew allows data scientists and data analysts to visually enhance and normalize the data without the need of writing the code. AWS Glue Elastic views allow app developers to use SQL to merge and replicate the data beyond numerous data stores. It allows different groups to work together on data incorporation tasks such as normalization, extraction, loading, cleaning and running ETL workflows. In this way, you minimize the time it takes in analyzing the data.

Pros

It has made it easier to identify, prepare, and merge data for machine learning, analytics, and app development. It provides all the capabilities required for data incorporation and allows you to analyze data and put it to use in minutes despite months. It provides a code-based and visual interface and makes data incorporation easier. By using its data catalog, users can discover and access the data easily.

Cons

The graphical user interface is not user-friendly as compared to other ETL tools. Also, it does not provide any concept for data streaming. It is hard to use for non-developers. It is very difficult to implement it as it involves concepts such as ETL scripts. It takes much time to start the job for the first time. It can be costly depending on your plan on doing with it. It supports limited no. of file types. It provides less customization and no visualization.