AutoCAD Reviews - Page 5

It enables employees and friends to work on the same project concurrently, which in return enhances teamwork and communication. It is practically a limitless digital TD software. It is comparatively simple to keep everything tidy after you get a handle on the most fundamental equipment.

Very high CPU usage. First time users do need some training, need at least some tutorials.

It is a powerful software that has been strengthened over time. It is so dynamic and versatile that it is used by a wide range of professionals, from animators to surveyors and geographers like me. What I like most is its precision in terms of drawing objects with measurements, with very specific area and volume, it stands out over other tools with similar functions. It is the most precise tool I have known so far to make parcel drawings and urban plans efficiently. Very important for the digitization of topographic surveys, very necessary for the management of the cadastre.

It is not an easy-to-use software. You must spend a lot of time studying with tutorials or paid courses to learn how to use it and even then there is no guarantee that you will handle all the functions of Autocad, it depends on the professional area where you are going to be employed.

I like the almost unlimited options you have to draw. I like the numerous menus of options that it has, as well as its automatic adaptation for each case. The use of a command line to manage the software makes it easier to use and therefore its use. Easily integrates with resources and files from other applications. Its integration with other programs of the autodesk suite, makes its use in the design of engineering projects almost indispensable. Its precision is remarkable. The integration for the use of this software for the handling of the plotters and equipment of exit helps notably in the operation of production.

I do not like that it has limitations to handle more than 600 thousand points. When we have needed to manage several .dwg files of different versions, the software can be fragile, it hangs up or it just comes out. The availability of help on errors is not so good. The network licensing system, for the moment of its activation must be easier to activate in the work stations. The management of vectorized images is not as powerful as it can fail faster if this number of images are larger when they are in the same plane and that is a problem. External references can be more versatile and easier to handle and even for different network locations and protocols.

AutoCAD is one of the most (if not the most) intuitive CAD suites on the market today. Interfaces are simple, tools and functions are clearly distinguished, and the workspace is the most fluid one I've used. Drafting on AutoCAD is the closest thing to drafting on paper - and that is by design. Beyond ease-of-use, the suite also caters to most industry formats, with little to no adjustments needing to be made by the user - other formats are thoroughly understood by the software, and it makes the necessary changes to imported files, saving countless hours of adjusting or re-drafting.

There is very little one could complain about when it comes to AutoCAD. As the operator of small enterprises, though, AutoCAD might seem expensive. Although I can argue it is well worth the price, making the suite more financially accessible would reinforce its position as the world-leader in CAD.

Ease of utilize. Permits you to keep the interface the same all through the a long time whereas still including highlights. I have been utilizing AutoCAD for over 20 a long time. It's the as it were framework I would utilize. AutoCAD is exceptionally flexible, and I truly just like the user's capacity to set up their possess default environment that can be utilized for modern ventures going forward.

AutoCAD is troublesome to memorize particularly for outright apprentices. too, when working on overwhelming records, it can be troublesome to form changes on the record without the chance of your framework slacking or indeed smashing. the client interface is baffling but, i trust they audit it and make it more curiously for clients.

One of the best design programs that I use and helps me well in designing engineering projects and gives impressive results

One of the drawbacks of the program is the large storage space for the project

It is not an easy to use software, you need some program lessoning. How i teached 4 years of autocad at faculty, i well know the students' difficulties, in particular fitting the mouse and zooming in needs for good coordination by motora.and then decorating the controls.integration was gradual in my work, but today everyone works well with the software.I like to be able to type the controls which makes the work a lot easier.

What i don't like about autocad is the new desing, i use the classic, because i work with the keyboard commands then those giant bars are in the way and steal space on the notebook and computer screen. Controls difficult to use no, but as it is a heavy program sometimes with topographical plans that are giant, the program is slow, even with a good plate a good avell computer.

AutoCAD's versatility allows it to be used across various industries and disciplines, accommodating a wide range of design needs. Whether you're an architect, engineer, or designer, AutoCAD provides the tools and functionalities to create precise and detailed designs.

AutoCAD is a resource-intensive software that demands significant computing power and system requirements. Users with older or less powerful computers may experience performance issues or limitations when running AutoCAD.

1. It has great features to manage small to large projects 2. Provides exact details and measurement 3. Great flexibility of usage 4. Coordination of entire construction drawing, design and documentation is much easier 5. Saves time

1. Expensive startup cost 2. Takes time to ensure proper mastery of features 3. There are limited file formats it support 4. The software needs strong processing power 5. Expensive professional training

AutoCAD is great for drawing, draughting, or just any technical drawing, whether that be in 2D or 3D. The software is very versatile in its capabilities. From the first time I opened the software, I understood why it is said to be compatible with various industries that use CAD. I use AutoCAD for any and everything in my daily practice, from very simple concept drawings to more complicated and intricate details. AutoCAD also integrates seamlessly with other software. With AutoCAD as the industry standard, one can only benefit from knowing and having this software.

For someone who does not have a basic understanding or experience with CAD software, there is a very steep learning curve. As I don't particularly benefit from the yearly updates and have not been impacted by all the software changes in the last 5 years, not being able to purchase the software once-off is a big downside. As a small business in a developing country, the annual subscription really affects my business greatly.

Ease of use. Allows you to keep the interface the same throughout the years while still adding features. I have been using AutoCAD for over 20 years. It's the only system I would use.

The new subscription based versions, are pricy in my opinion. Not like the old maintenance versions of past years. The software has only gotten better year after year. But the way you buy/pay, I'm not a fan.

The newers version and the integration with the different software. The use of .dxf to work with different external autocad programs that are used in mining, for example the most common vulcan. Also for big project Naviswork represent a light presentation for clients in order to see and manage or the different discipline in the engineering .

Despite integration, there are limitations in big project and different disciplines. Also, working with old versions that work under bad standards generates many errors in the CAD, and sometimes it is difficult to eliminate them (lines, references, etc.). One other thing that is difficult to use around our global office and clients is that in order to obtain the potencial of the software everyone have to work with the same standard. And in some project we are using not all the tools that autocad offers. The price for some clients is very expensive and they only use viewers.

Me encanta que sea una herramienta de dibujo libre ya que permite que el usuario pueda diseñar cualquier objeto y con cualquier forma sin parámetros. Me facilita que pueda sobreponer archivos y evidenciar los problemas de construcción que podrían aparecer a futuro. Me gusta que se construya en 3D a la par que se va trabajando en la hoja de trabajo.

Me disgusta que, en ocasiones, la aplicación colapsa cuando se usa la herramienta "hatch". Pero, es un problema fácil de resolver (creándole una polilínea previa y evitar que no se haga el correcto llenado del dibujo). Recomiendo siempre instalar el problema en Inglés para facilitar el uso de comandos.

Most features in AutoCAD are pretty self explanatory with helpful hints and tip built in. For the average user, most of the base features are easy to use with minimal set up. But there is a high level of depth that can be utilized by people with a further understanding of the software.

Some of the set up steps, and options can be a bit much for the more technologically disinclined people. Essentially requires the need to have someone on hand that is well versed in how to work the inner components of AutoCAD, to really get the most out of the software.

Ease of use is what drew me to auto cad in the first place. I had limited training and I was able to sit down and play with it and the menu's and teach myself to design and verify fit and function. I used it for everything from selection and placement of office furniture to machine placement optimization. I designed test fixtures and prints for electrical boxes. There really was no end to Auto CAD uses.

3d aspects were hard to understand for me although I'm sure with the proper training this wouldn't have been the case. Most CAD users have college courses under their belts. Sometimes my design would get off axis and I'd have a very difficult time understanding what happened and how to set it back on the correct plane. Use of layers was challenging but once understood it's really helpful in breaking down your designs.

É fácil de utilizar, tem imensas funcionalidades praticas e é basicamente como passar do desenho à mão rigoroso para o computador sem esforço.

É um pouco limitado em termos de 3D e em termos de adaptação para o sistema Mac Os

What I have liked most about AutoCAD throughout my university and professional career is that it allows me to create precise and detailed drawings with ease for both designs and more sophisticated construction jobs, something else that I have to highlight is its wide range of commands and options that streamlined my work, while the non-destructive editing feature gave me flexibility on college projects and construction jobs where I work.

The negative points to highlight is that it is an application that requires having a computer with good features because it requires a lot to work correctly, another negative point that it has is that the software can become slow and cumbersome in very complex or very large projects. , which affected the flow of my work.

This software is the friendliest but at the same time complete that can exist for the design sector, its interface is user friendly which is not difficult to learn as in other CAD software.

Although I mentioned that it is complete, in a sense it may have more functions than other software.

Autocad es una de las aplicaciones más complejas de uso, sin embargo, una vez dominada se vuelve una herramienta básica en cualquier inmobiliaria. La facilidad para realizar planos a escala de terrenos es, en caso personal, mi mayor utilidad y el día a día en la oficina.

Es un poco compleja de uso, sin embargo, mi apoyo principal fue Youtube para aprenderla a utilizar. Puedes requerir mayor soporte que a lo mejor hacer plano muy básico basándote en Google Earth u otras aplicaciones, sin embargo, esta se vuelve una herramienta básica en cualquier inmobiliaria.

What I like about AutoCAD is its versatility and precision in creating detailed designs across various fields like architecture, engineering, and manufacturing. The ability to create 2D and 3D models with intricate details and layers makes it a powerful tool for professionals.

It can be resource-intensive, requiring a powerful computer for optimal performance, which can be a barrier for some users. Some also find the licensing costs to be quite high, making it less accessible for smaller firms or individual users

It's a great program for drafting and design. When it comes to incorporating survey data, drone imagery, etc., it's hard to beat. It's really an industry standard for a reason, and is incredibly powerful when it comes to land development and other civil and environmental engineering design work. Once you get the hang of it and realize that there are many different approaches to the same solution, things get really interesting. There's also a robust online community for answering questions. Because it's an industry standard, there are tons of online tutorials and walkthroughs for a whole host of hang ups one might have.

The program can crash when designs get very complicated, and sometimes, if there's a bug in a drawing, it can be hard to remove or back out and simplify. I've had to completely start from scratch more than a handful of times which can be frustrating. Once you find out the things that tend to bog it down, there's work arounds, and ways to make it more resilient. Another drawback is that it's fairly expensive. Not a huge issue if you are working for a company, but if you'd like to use it yourself, or are a small business, it's not an insignificant expense.

What I like most about using AutoCAD is its precision and versatility in creating detailed designs and technical drawings. The software’s powerful tools and customizable features make it easy to bring complex ideas to life, whether I’m working on architectural plans or intricate interior layouts. Its ability to handle both 2D and 3D designs is a major advantage for any project.

What I like least about AutoCAD is its steep learning curve and the complexity of its interface, which can be overwhelming for new users. Additionally, the software can be quite resource-intensive, requiring a powerful computer to run smoothly and efficiently.

AutoCAD software by Autodesk is the best 2D CAD software in the market.This software can be learned quickly using the online documentation / manual provided by Autodesk.Students who have learnt this software get good placement offers.Every year Autodesk releases the next version of the software with lot of product enhancements.

Every year qualified educational institutions have to renew their free access to their software and IT administrators have to update generate and then update their license servers. This results in additional load to the IT administrators managing the license servers. It will be better if 3-year license is provided instead of yearly licenses.Product technical support can be improved for educational institutions.More features can be added for 3D design similar to 2D design.