Microsoft Azure Reviews - Page 6

La creación de Servicios en Azure es muy dinámica y fácil. Se pueden tener el control de costos muy controlado. El desbordamiento de procesamiento lo podemos realizar cuando se requiera. Azure nos permite de forma muy fácil integrar seguridad en las cargas de trabajo.

Algunos aspectos de servicios asociados que no quedan muy claros que debemos considerar en el tema de los costos.

For developers it is a great solution, so much is possible with 100+ features for every client migration or new project. I am teaching others how to use Azure and they are constantly amazed at the vast amount of features and services available, and most are free to try as well.

You can only use a trial for 30 days which should be enough for most, but it would be nice to extend so there is much more to explore. Other things are not free, so you do have to pay for what you want to use. The best parts are very expensive so you are only able to test these if your company pays for these features.

As a part of my job ,i use both azure and GCP for my application development and deployment. Will azure specifically, we have more flexibility in terms of deploying a service. I think with features like logic apps, web apps,VM etc azure give us more options compared to other cloud platforms. And in terms of security aswell we know that Microsoft is a trusted organization.

I think azure can make the logs access a little bit more accessible and easy.

Azure provides high scalability for applications and services. You can easily scale up or down your resources based on your requirements. Azure provides a wide range of services for building, deploying, and managing applications and services. It provides a pay-as-you-go pricing model, which means you only pay for the resources you use, making it cost-effective. Azure provides a high level of security for your applications and services, including compliance with industry standards such as HIPAA and ISO.

Azure can be complex, especially for users who are not familiar with cloud computing or Microsoft technologies. Although Azure provides good documentation, it can be challenging to find answers to specific questions or issues. Customer support can also be slow. Although Azure provides a pay-as-you-go pricing model, the cost of using Azure can add up quickly if you're not careful about resource usage.

Azure is well-integrated into Microsoft set of Development Tools, like Visual Studio and allows easy deployment and automation.

It is quite expensive, but it saves us a lot of efforts in the long run by providing scalable infrastructure solution.

I found Microsoft Azure to be incredibly beneficial. One of the features I liked the most was its scalability. Azure allows businesses to quickly and easily increase or decrease their computing capacity as needed, without needing to purchase or manage physical servers or other hardware. This makes it much easier for businesses to manage their computing needs, as they can quickly add more resources when needed. Another feature I liked was the cost savings. It can be expensive to purchase and maintain physical servers, but with Azure, businesses can pay for only the services they use. This can help businesses save money while still ensuring they have the computing resources they need.

I didn't like the complexity of setting up and managing resources. It took a lot of time to understand and configure.

No sé si el termino nube fue hecho para describir a azure, o si fue azure quien lo invento; pero tanto bases de datos, como dominios, páginas web, recursos para aplicaciones móviles, servidores en máquinas virtuales destinadas para lo que se les pueda ocurrir o utilizar, gestión de archivos y todo esto controlado por cuentas de usuarios y privilegios de acceso en grupos o usuarios, hacen que todo el ambiente de desarrollo que se ocupa para estén en esta herramienta. Por las razones anteriores, una vez que crean un proyecto en azure, es difícil que se considere moverlo a otra plataforma nube, por que literalmente ahí está toda la infraestructura que se requiere.

Más que algo malo es algo de sentido común, si vas a utilizar la nube de Microsoft, lo lógico es esperar que sus herramientas tengan mayor soporte a ser compatible con dicha tecnología nube; sin embargo, tanto para Linux o mac, a través de .net core es posible crear proyectos de software que utilicen las muchas api desarrolladas para trabajar con azure.

Since we base most of our operations on Microsoft products, Azure was a logical choice for us for multiple reasons, like automation and seamless integrations.

It takes a long time to train an administrator that can do a good job.

We are using Azure for user based management for profile login the basic and almost features what we like was ease of authentication and login. Coustomer support is one of the best thing in azure(Quick and best resolution).

User interface of Microsoft Azure was bit disgusting and it takes time to adopt to all the features available and for new users also it will be difficult to learn quickly.

We can move to the cloud from on premises in phases - databases, virtual machines, web hosting, etc. There is also an excellent cost estimation calculator to help determine how much this will cost.

Azure is such a broad based enterprise tool, it can be difficult to know where to start adopting it.

Hybrid capabilities: Azure provides hybrid cloud capabilities, allowing users to seamlessly integrate on-premises infrastructure with cloud services. This enables organizations to extend their existing infrastructure to the cloud, ensuring a smooth transition and coexistence between on-premises and cloud environments.

Complexity of networking: For users without prior networking experience, setting up and managing networking configurations and concepts in Azure, including as virtual networks, subnets, load balancers, and security groups, can be challenging. For secure and effective communication across resources, it is essential to comprehend and properly configure network settings.

Adopting Azure to replace on premise infrastructure makes life much more easier to end point management for mobile devices and data security.

Azure connect to while using both on premise and cloud is not easily deployed through azure AD connect.

Facilidad de uso e implementación, ahorro de costos, seguridad y simplificación.

Considero que es una solución multicloud que ofrece muchas ventajas que resulta complejo argumentar algo que no sea beneficioso.

User authentication and security is extremely good. There are of course standard tools like MFA, but also several other layers of identity protection built in that detect risky or unusual activity. Accounts can/will be blocked when risk levels rise. Remediation is easy and the tools to investigate risks are very robust. Internally it allows us to offer the levels of access and permissions that our complex structure require.

It is such a big product that it can take a while to get to know. Once you do become familiar it isn't uncommon for things to change and you need to adjust your workflow or learning to acommodate the changes.

Speed Data Security Introduction to Azure DevOpsDeliver Big Data Solution on AzureDeliver Application Integration on AzureIOTAzure infrastructure as code (ARM Templates)An introduction to Azure security-related servicesMonitoring & Diagnostics services

Sometime support in different region and complicated pricing.

AWS is providing the good End to end cloud solution. We are able to setup large amount of VMs very frequently. We can Scale up-down our resources in a click of button.

The pricing of the application is very high if you are using there resources for several years and it will affect your return on investment.

Microsoft Azure support and infrastructure speed is a lot better than other hostings like Google Platform. It allows the capability with user friendly environment to engage and work with features. Microsoft Azure has great features with Tunnels, VM, Storage and DNS. Microsoft server 2019 can interact in a great way with Azure cloud.

Microsoft Azure cost is high with Traffic, VM and other features. It should be reduced to an affordable packages. Microsoft Azure Storage cost is higher than other platforms regardless of the region location.

The versatility and scalability of Azure are two of its most noticeable benefits. Users can tailor their cloud architecture to meet their unique demands by selecting from a variety of services, including as virtual machines, containers, and serverless computing solutions. Azure also offers powerful capabilities for controlling and monitoring resources, making it simple to scale up or down in response to changes in demand.

Complexity is a thing I like least about microsoft azure. Setting up and managing the Azure platform can be difficult and time-consuming because to the huge variety of services and capabilities it offers. For smaller businesses or those with few IT resources, this can be especially difficult.

Azure has the ability to be used either by its web UI or from the command line. It offers several options with integrations with other services and applications. Obviously one of the main take aways is that they only charge you for what you use and enable the usage of other cloud providers. When developing applications or solutions Azure gives you the option to download ARM templates which are helpful when replicating work already done in other projects.

Documentation is very ambiguous at times and limited. I do believe Azure usage is "relatively" new so thats why there isn't many blogs or Stackoverflow posts that can help you solve issues with solutions in Azure. Microsoft has the tendency of not replying to issues or replying with answers that are not helpful at all, so you're basically stuck waiting for another user to discover a proper solution or finding it out yourself.

Microsoft Azure provides a bevy of cloud computing services at competitive pricing such that any size of business can afford to implement them. One of the best aspects is the ability to scale those services as needed near instantaneously. Also, having the services in one, easy to navigate place makes governance and management much more simple than having them spread out among providers.

Microsoft Azure is a big service, so knowing what all is there is a big chore. Starting small and targeting the approach will help a lot.

I like most of the resources that we deploy are auto updated and especially if it is from Microsoft. Microservices especially works great with Azure. Very flexible and simple to maintain

Cost is the onyl drawback which can be relooked

Our company has recently purchased Microsoft Azure and we started using it a few months ago. While I have a few experiences in using other data housing tools before, I was curious to see what Azure uniquely offers. Here a short review of my experience so far: Pros - 1. Multiple Data Sets in One User Account Basically, Azure was the answer to the problem of having to create multiple accounts in order...

Read more

Cons - 1. Difficulty of customization Currently, it doesn't have the feature that enables customization of processors. This should be available soon in order to give users more control of the data and its management. 2. Price of product itself and services Cost should be lower considering that most clients are businesses and support services are more likely to be needed frequently due to the number of users in a single organization or office just like ours. Also, customer support is not that good. During the one time we tried to reach out to an agent, it took a while before the issue got completely addressed.

I use Azure (Cloud Computing Platform & Services by Microsoft) everyday for Infrastructure as-a-Service (IaaS) and Platform as-a-Service (Paas) cloud computing service models. I like the Azure portal and the tigth integration with other tools and services like Azure DevOps, Visual Studio, Office 365 and Active Directory.

It could be improve the way to create Infrastructure as Code (IaC). For now Azure Resource Manager (ARM) is the only native way to create IaC on Azure and for a beginner is not so easy: other vendors (like AWS with CloudFormation) offer better experience.