App comparison

Add up to 4 apps below to see how they compare. You can also use the "Compare" buttons while browsing.

mabl Logo
mabl

Write a review

Intelligent test automation for Agile teams.

visit website

(0)

GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links. Learn more

mabl Features

Features Summary

Functionality

3.8

/5

66

Total features

39

4 categories

mabl features

API
Activity Dashboard
Alerts/Notifications
Approval Workflow
Bug Tracking
Collaboration Tools
Configurable Workflow
Configuration Management

Common features of DevOps software

API
Activity Dashboard
Activity Tracking
Application Management
Approval Workflow
Audit Management
Authentication
Change Management

Price starts from

ic-pricetag

No pricing info

Pricing options
Free plan
Subscription
Free trial

Screenshots

Contenders comparison

Functionality

3.8

/5

66

Price starts from

ic-pricetag

No pricing info

visit website

Total Features

39

Unique features

  • Customizable Reports

  • Data Extraction

  • Reporting & Statistics

  • Activity Dashboard

Functionality

4.7

/5

6K

Price starts from

ic-pricetag

No pricing info

learn more

Total Features

42

Features in Common

8

Unique features

  • Multiple Projects

  • @mentions

  • Reporting/Project Tracking

  • Authentication

Functionality

4.6

/5

1K

Price starts from

29

/user

Per month

visit website

Total Features

64

Features in Common

15

Unique features

  • Project Management

  • Project Templates

  • Testing Management

  • Incident Management

Common mabl comparisons

Reviewers who mentioned features said:

AvatarImg
AvatarImg

Siddhant W.

Information Technology and Services, 51-200 employees

Used weekly for less than 6 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend9/10

Share this review:

Simplest and best automation tool using machine learning for testing

Reviewed 6 years ago
Pros

This is one of the simplest tools for software testing purpose. It helps to automate web browsers like Selenium IDE and Selenium WebDriver and other such automation tools. mabl is a really great platform as it is lightweight and a simple browser plugin that does the work. No heavy sized software download, even though a great tool. It is the only automation tool recently built that has an outstanding...

Cons

No cons presently, just loving the tool. I would really prefer if the tool was free of cost (open source) like Selenium and other automation tools. Life would be in our pockets and we would be called the AUTOMATION BOSSES of mabl using Machine learning.

MD
AvatarImg

Matthew D.

Information Technology and Services, 51-200 employees

Used other for less than 6 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend2/10

Share this review:

The product has more bugs than its worth, and it takes longer to perform its tests than one of my te

Reviewed 6 years ago

I want to be clear, I think that this product is on the right track, and is going to be amazing. this tool will free up the testers from the less effective validation of the product by doing that kind of testing, thus freeing up the tester to actually test and see where things break. Ai is the automation direction that we need to go, and mabl will free up money and people to do the jobs that we are needed to do.

Pros

It is easy to set up use, and get running. Apparently I have to be more wordy in this field, why I dont know.

Cons

The problem is that the tool will log its self out and then pass the remaining tests. The chrome pug-in requires a login but then forces the user to log in again to the website in the same browser, after clicking the button in the plug-in. creating tests that would manipulate the data seem easy, with applying some simple coding skills the user is able to create valuable tests. the problem is that mabl cant find the field, button, or part of the page that was selected in the test creation and simply stop running, no error, nothing. Dont get me wrong I think that this tool is going to be amazing, the problem is that it is simply not there yet.

AR
AvatarImg

Verified reviewer

Computer Software, 51-200 employees

Used daily for 1-2 years

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend7/10

Share this review:

Simple, yet powerful

Reviewed 5 years ago

Previously, with our selenium-based framework tests would take too long to write and maintain, which made it impossible to develop new e2e tests within sprints for the new features we were developing. With Mabl, we can quickly write tests so that we have UI automation coverage within the same sprint for new features.

Pros

Mabl has become the go-to for our e2e testing needs. Creation and maintenance of tests has become a breeze. Test failure investigation is quicker than before with detailed screenshots and HAR captures.

Cons

Mabl is not always able to handle tricker elements in our UI, which requires us to write custom JS steps or reach to to their support. Also, run-time of our tests is slower than our previous selenium-based tests.

AR
AvatarImg

Verified reviewer

Computer Software, 201-500 employees

Used weekly for less than 6 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend7/10

Share this review:

Useful test automation tool for monitoring website performance and checking broken links

Reviewed 6 years ago

Learned about a new and easy to use web monitoring tool which provides easy access to UI tests with with little setup time, but provides long term reporting on issues with an app.

Pros

Mabl provides a very straightforward user interface to set up an automated test which can perform smoke tests like checking all of the links on a page and report back all of the broken links. The learning curve is very small, so you can set up a new test in production in less than 10 minutes having never used the app before. It will send out a report by e-mail at your preferred interval with the test execution status, time, run time, pages checked, links checked and broken links.

Cons

It is quite bare bones as it is, if you already have complex API tests in Postman, Selenium IDE and Java/C# tests Jenkins, then Using Mabl in addition to these would really be nothing more than a novelty. Because your current unit tests and CI smoke tests probably provide ample code coverage. I would imagine the value from the mabl tests are aimed at a novice user with zero development background who needs basic website monitoring. Because you could probably get this data and more details on page exceptions from a tool like Datadog, Bugsnag or Kibana or Kubernetes. I would imagine that future iterations of the product will probably be more feature rich in these areas.

MC
AvatarImg

Mike C.

Used daily for less than 6 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support

Share this review:

mabl has been solid for me in the brief time that I've used it.

Reviewed 6 years ago
Pros

One of the ways by which I use mabl is for crawling pages, to look for broken links. mabl does an outstanding job of doing that, as well as reporting what it finds. I also like the mabl staff. They are very forthcoming in touching base with their user base to solicit feedback, answer questions, etc. Super responsive as well, which is huge for me, as when I evaluate tools for consideration, no matter how good they may be, if the customer service is bad, it's a deal breaker. You will not have that bad experience with mabl. Very solid documentation as well, which is not always the case with new companies. They are constantly updating it, as things change and/or new features are added.

Cons

I would love to see the ability to schedule runs at selected days, times, etc. Also, what I hope is forthcoming from mabl, is the ability to tunnel into private test environments.

AvatarImg
AvatarImg

Ryan R.

Information Services, 11-50 employees

Used daily for less than 6 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend10/10

Share this review:

Exactly what my company was looking for - but have a dev help set up tests

Reviewed 6 years ago

We do frequent deployments of our web software, and this *finally* lets us build a library of regression tests in a user-friendly fashion... without relying on home-grown Selenium/Behat/Mink nightmares.

Pros

I love the ability to capture journeys with the Trainer... it's a brilliant tool that makes setup incredibly fast. Also love the automatic regression testing, though that's created some "false alarms" for us in the past.

Cons

1) It still requires a bit of web engineering background to set up *proper* tests. A tech-minded product manager may be able to create some basic "is the site up"-type tests, but nothing involving variables, authentication, etc. 2) Unless I'm missing something, variables don't seem to persist across journeys... which would be very useful. We create users on one web application, and then process them in another - so it'd be good to "follow" them through the entire workflow.

AR
AvatarImg

Verified reviewer

Used daily for less than 6 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support

Share this review:

A powerful test tool that is continuing to improve and become increasingly more valuable

Reviewed 6 years ago
Pros

I like that a number of tests start running right away when you add a new app. I like the customer service, they are professional, friendly and helpful

Cons

It is time-consuming to set up the tests and often you must run the journeys over and over to see if they will work or not.

AvatarImg
AvatarImg

Vikram V.

Financial Services, 201-500 employees

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend8/10

Share this review:

mabl has the potential to become valuable partner to tech community

Reviewed 6 years ago

easy to record user actions, easy to run in cloud

Pros

I tried using mabl for a week and I found it useful in below way - easy to record, playback user scenarios - can do complex user interactions - cloud based execution - built in AI - great customer support from all the members in company

Cons

- support for only few browsers - slowness in test execution - customization and scripting of recorded user scenarios - many usability issues

JB
AvatarImg

John B.

Information Technology and Services, 1-10 employees

Used daily for 6-12 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend10/10

Share this review:

Preeminent ML-driven test automation solution

Reviewed 6 years ago

Saves a lot of time as well as not having to have a developer spend countless hours every week doing the drudgery work which mabl takes care of for us.

Pros

Easiest end-to-end machine learning driven test automation solution available which got us up and running on all of our apps. We just love getting the daily and informative emails keeping us all up to date on any new findings. Just an awesome app and I highly recommend anyone and everyone to quickly install mabl and let mabl run it's magic for your apps.

Cons

The only con we have seen so far is that the reported bad links includes a small subset of links that are not currently relevant, i.e. the links were valid at one time, but are not currently valid. But the report picks them up as broken which they are so it would be great if such links could easily be masked until they are re-used at some point in the future.

KA
AvatarImg

Karthik A.

Used daily for 6-12 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support

Share this review:

Very promising next generation tool for web application testing

Reviewed 6 years ago
Pros

The auto-heal feature and the ability of the tool to traverse the entire application without much configuration.

Cons

The ability to modify and design test scripts. The mabl trainer can be little finicky and it is not very easy to delete and modify steps. Mabl trainer can use some improvements to its user interface.

SB
AvatarImg

Suraj B.

Used daily for less than 6 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend7/10

Share this review:

Better alternative for Selenium/Cucumber.

Reviewed 6 years ago
Pros

1. Didn't break due to minor UI changes 2. Managing journeys, plans and their scheduling was easy 3. IP whitelisting, server authentications were very useful

Cons

1. Many of the broken links were found. Again, there were no info about response time, request timeout duration, number of attempts made to open the links and status codes received. 2. There is no exclusion list for links which need not be checked for its correctness 3. It didn't identify the model pop-ups on click of a link as it was expecting a page 4. Not enough info on JS error/exceptions

kr
AvatarImg

kannaki r.

Health, Wellness and Fitness, 11-50 employees

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend8/10

Share this review:

mabl is easy to use for website testing and interface is very good

Reviewed 6 years ago

able to record the website and check for the images or broken links.

Pros

1.Easy to use , not much complicated workflow. 2.Recording is easy and the errors are highlighted well to followup. 3.help document is thorough

Cons

1.Tool is slow to load the scripts 2.Failed cases not explaining exactly why it fails 3.Unable to inter-grate with testcases

yb
AvatarImg

yogendra babu G.

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support

Share this review:

It is a fabulous automation tool which helps testing ease

Reviewed 6 years ago
Pros

Easily configurable. Friendly User Interface. Auto test case generation. Test execution scheduling which is hectic job in other automation tools.

Cons

Enabling local testing helps lot more partners to join. Better Test data management will help run the data driven tests

AR
AvatarImg

Verified reviewer

Computer Software, 11-50 employees

Used other for 6-12 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support

Share this review:

Mabl is a very innovative idea and it makes testing not stink

Reviewed 6 years ago
Pros

Personally, I hate writing test automation and this makes it way easier. Tests no longer become brittle over time and Mabl adapts to changing UIs. It's also super easy to implement into your CI/CD pipeline.

Cons

Initially I struggled with getting it to test web apps behind corporate firewalls but this was fixed when I could whitelist the Mabl IP addresses. The UI takes a bit of getting used to as well in terms of navigation.

AvatarImg
AvatarImg

masha m.

51-200 employees

Used other for less than 6 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend10/10

Share this review:

Smart automated testing

Reviewed 6 years ago

mabls daily execution of tests and use of machine learning have helped me better understand which tests are most helpful in assessing the usability of my company's web-based software products.

Pros

Insights are given on each test that is ran, the UI is nice on the eyes and easy to navigate. Getting up and running tests on mabl is painless and quick. The customization of tests and trainer is fairly easy to use. Test metrics are reported in a beautiful layout, and issues are easy to spot.

Cons

Like any automation software, once you start building out a test plan in their system, you become locked in and dependent on them for running tests. But the time that it saves compared to building up an automation suite from scratch using open source software might be worth the price.

AvatarImg
AvatarImg

Robert A.

Used weekly for 6-12 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend9/10

Share this review:

Affordable way to run automated testing and validations

Reviewed 6 years ago

Reduction in manual testing of functionality.

Pros

Very easy to setup and use; Management and reporting of tests are very intuitive. The system allows for easy alterations to existing tests and branching.

Cons

Does not work on all browsers and multiple view ports. The price is increasing in May, but it is still very affordable

AvatarImg
AvatarImg

Robert W.

Used weekly for 6-12 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend9/10

Share this review:

Real-time software for administering automated tests

Reviewed 6 years ago

Enables interviews to be conducted accurately and hire the right employees

Pros

There is training that is provided to enable the new user learn more about the product The customer service is excellent

Cons

The user interface needs to be updated and i hope the next versions of the software will accommodate that concern

AR
AvatarImg

Verified reviewer

Utilities, 1,001-5,000 employees

Used daily for less than 6 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support

Share this review:

Set up E2E tests in no time

Reviewed 6 years ago
Pros

Business user friendly interface and low barrier of entry. Easy integration into CI process. The monitoring capabilities are detailed and easy to understand.

Cons

I'd like to have more options on asserting conditions during a test. Other than that, I have have nothing much to complain.

PY
AvatarImg

Prashant Y.

Computer Software, 1-10 employees

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend8/10

Share this review:

Very good application in fast changing world of testing.

Reviewed 5 years ago

The experience is good, it's the need of the current time.

Pros

No need to maintain ever changing locators, one of the best part of the machine learning based application.

Cons

Less exposure towards writing own code leading to less customisation.

NW
AvatarImg

Nathan W.

Computer Software, 201-500 employees

Used weekly for less than 6 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend8/10

Share this review:

I found MABL to be a solid ML based testing tool - set up basic test/checks.

Reviewed 6 years ago

Automated testing with very little configuration, out of the box validations, lots of depth and customization options.

Pros

The automatic execution is nice - not having to set up triggers and timers manually is appreciated. The ML aspect is interesting, and hopefully I can dig into this a little more in the near future. I would like to use this for service testing as well as UI based scripts.

Cons

Nothing so far, all worked well! I would like to dig into the validation rules a little bit more and see what depth of testing is supported, as well as options for custom scripts (import Cucumber script etc.)

PO
AvatarImg

Patrick O.

Used other for 6-12 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend10/10

Share this review:

Really enjoy using MABL

Reviewed 6 years ago
Pros

mabl allows us to automate a lot of our testing saving time and money. The paths are easy to create.

Cons

It can be dificult to manage noisy mabl notifications. It did take some work to get the system to notify only on what is important to team.

AvatarImg
AvatarImg

Uri K.

Financial Services, 51-200 employees

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support

Share this review:

Could not get it to work

Reviewed 6 years ago

None

Pros

What it tries to accomplish is wonderful, and the ease of use could potentially save my QA team a lot of time.

Cons

First it broke when I tried to edit a journey (500 message). Then it worked but moving steps around was impossible and it never added new steps in the right place. Finally, I ran a test and it could not find the field in my webpage.

SS
AvatarImg

Saranya S.

Computer Software, 10,001+ employees

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend7/10

Share this review:

Mabl is pretty good tool for automation testers. Auto Heal is an awesome functionality.

Reviewed 6 years ago

Ease of use.

Pros

Auto Heal API Call to trigger execution Journey creation - simple and easy Test Execution triggers Broken link validation

Cons

Tool could have provisions to create user specific actions. There is no support to have the scripts pushed to version control System

AK
AvatarImg

Alexander K.

Computer Software, 51-200 employees

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend7/10

Share this review:

It is very useful to get done the job faster

Reviewed 6 years ago
Pros

There are many features, I think even not technical person can start creating testing project. There is also room to grow.

Cons

There workflow was not obvious for the first time user. Need some time and efforts to make the test working

JH
AvatarImg

Joshua H.

Computer Software, 501-1,000 employees

Used weekly for less than 6 months

Review source

Overall Rating
  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Features
  • Customer support
  • Likelihood to recommend6/10

Share this review:

MABL the low code/codeless tool

Reviewed 2 years ago
Pros

It is easy to use and does not require much programming knowledge to start writing test scripts

Cons

We faced troubles with flakey tests and implemented hard waits for the application to finish with queries to backend. However, that is not the best solution and can cause unnecessary added execution time to the tests.