OpenShift Features

Openshift v2 was an excellent product that I couldn't fault at all, in fact I really really liked it. The problem came when Red Hat wanted everyone to move from v2 to v3 and gave very short notice and a very short timeline. Version 3 was completely different, based on containers.

As stated above, the real problem with Openshift is the way Red Hat forced everyone to move from v2 to v3 in a ridiculously short time. Documentation for migration was useless, I tried to migrate using it - it all failed. I could not trust Red Hat again after that experience, so I moved to Linode and have never looked back.

Easy to use, full of useful feature. It make easy and valuable migration to innovative achitecture based on containerized approach. You can use a community edition (Openshift Origin) or chose the RED HAT edition. Based on Kubernetes. Fully integrated with many other useful tool for monitoring and manager the full software cycle, until the deploy.

Documentation is still poor. Not so fast in receive support from community. Security aspect need to be better debeate.

I am using Redhat Openshift container since 1 1/2 years and i really loved since deploying and monitoring the application is very easy when compare to deploying the application in traditional app servers like Tomcat

Pricing for enterprise is bit costly when compare with Amazon web services (AWS).Also engaging Redhat support team to troubleshoot the issue is very difficult

It's fairly easy to use when it's well set up by the administrators. Documentation is very complete. Creation and management of volumes and persistent volumes. Pod log is fairly useful for debugging.

Secrets management need more user-friendly editing. Large amount of pipelines in the same project makes it hardly manageable. Pod log randomly skips entries.

it is a good management platform run on kubernetes for containerized applications.

You must learn it from a expert devOps engineer or else it too hard learn.

I've used gcp, eks and aks before. When I compared them by looking at them, it was very useful that I could load and edit yamls on a user interface of its own.

Since it uses old versions of kubernetes, you may encounter interesting bugs.

ease of Deployment ease for monitoring the logs build management Config validation

Monitoring is poor logs are not accesible directly for real time , only first n number of lines are visible

Ease of deployment and management of Kubernetes cluster. Very comfortable service and route management.

Not having a gpu scheduling option for machine learning models.

* Very simple to setup and configure * Friendly user interface * Great dashboards * Broad set of integrations * Large collection of guides and tutorials

* Monitoring could be improved * Troubleshooting can be tricky, as it's not always easy to find out exactly what's going wrong

It provides a complete suite for software containerization. At the same time, it is based on open-source Kubernetes.

I did not find it easy to integrate other third-party tools in the open shift. It is good as long as you stay in the toolset.

it's very effective when be used with openstack for managing our infrastructure, and it provides great services like monitoring containers, and databases

It's not easy to deal with, and for some issues the vendor takes long time to get it resolved, so it will be great if the user interface enhanced with more help options.

I had to do little changes to code, just for data persistence to db, globally the migration was very easy

A little con was the need to learn about rhc tool