Pricing model: Subscription
Contact Fusion Risk Management for pricing details.
4 reviewers had the following to say about Fusion Framework System's pricing:
Pros
Ease of use for non-admins; Reporting capabilities; Integration potential
Cons
Most system configurations and changes require vendor assistance, at cost.
Rating breakdown
Likelihood to recommend: 8/10
Pros
It is highly configurable and flexible software.
Cons
It has tons of unknown capabilities if exposed would bring tremendous value - support is great but leaves to you with little training to help to fish for the next time. Primarily used for Business Continuity but with limited support for Disaster Recovery
Rating breakdown
Likelihood to recommend: 8/10
I have worked with several different applications that support the Business Continuity / Emergency Management industry (over 20 years of experience). I have been able to develop key performance indicators to communicate the value of the investment into the application and the BC program. Once you understand how to make customization, it is very easy. The 'customization' have also been able to convert over to the most recent LEX upgrade.
Pros
The software allows for a Business Continuity / Emergency Management team to build the application desired to support THEIR defined program...not the program the vendor has defined.
Cons
It can be intimidating. There is so much flexibility, it does take a team lead to maintain the application. There are APIs that can be put in place to pull / push data between supporting applications (architecture, incident management, CMDB) if Fusion is not used for these features as well.
Rating breakdown
Likelihood to recommend: 10/10
The first intent was to get our business continuity management processes configured and managed in a structured and governed way of working. To solve less of standardization was also a key objective. Having Fusion RM operationalized and deployed in all entities in our scope we achieved the key objectives. In the mean time we started to include other domains to use their data (e.g. insurance risk) of an entity. This data became direct and real-time available. Based on this success the FRM platform expanded to an integrated resilience platform as of today. We included an advance threats, other domains with real-time data like security incident, emergency response, crisis management activities, etc etc. Real-time data is available, with an integrated overview of business, IT, insurance, and suppliers with financial values which in the past took too much time to get this insights. This resolved many business issues of delivery, quality and operational excellence. However there is always room for improvement to be faster, accurate, and complete.
Pros
The ease of use to connect all objects and data together and create a single lens as for an overview. In short the flexibility, capability to integrate data and user friendliness of the total system.
Cons
It's hard to say what we think is the least of the system. The biggest pitfall we always find is that there is as much as possible, and because of the enthusiasm to create as much as possible, the challenge is to keep things as simple as possible for the end user so that people keep on using the system for what it is meant for!
Rating breakdown
Likelihood to recommend: 10/10
