Shortcut Pricing

Shortcut is amazing for non-profits who need a flexible and no- to low-cost task/project management platform.

Unless you work in Agile methodology day in and day out, it can be difficult to understand how to effectively organize tasks/stories into epics and projects.

Joy of use, low barrier to add/modify things

Priorization of tasks and epics could be easier

Unlike other agile management platforms, Clubhouse is setup that you can get a lot of value from the simple Kanban board with the option to go deeper and track more in depth insights into the progress of your work. We moved to Clubhouse from a setup of Trello with a ton of extensions to help manage the extra tracking we wanted to be doing, and I think the best analogy I can make is that Clubhouse...

Read more

There isn't anything major that I would complain about, but there are some improvements like showing epic burn down charts by points instead of the number of stories that I've asked for a few times but haven't been implemented. The reporting functionality also has a few bugs, but nothing major that stops it from being valuable.

The software is incredible, it's easy to use, and the features just feats your team needs.

For Brazil it is a really expensive product, I wouldn't be able to pay the complete version, although I know that the free plan locks features that would be really helpful. Some international companies vary the price based on the exchange rate. That would allow to sell your product here easily. For example, for a team of 7 the price would be $84,00, that makes almost R$500,00 here that is almost the same as all the shopping (food, grocery..) for a family of two for a month. See?Other than that, it would be awesome to be able to change the team shortcut url. When I've created my team account I didn't know that the company name would be used for the URL, now it is very long and very ugly to share.

It is extremely easy to use. Quick to setup and understand. VERY cost effective! The team behind Shortcut delivers new and exciting functionality often that really makes a difference.

I have not idea to be honest. There are really no bad parts of Shortcut for what it is doing! Nice integrations and easy to use, not really something you can dislike.

I’ve used more complex software for ticket management and simpler tools, and Shortcut is the right balance of features, cost and ease of use.

Shortcut recently added Teams to their system which doesn’t work well with our workflow.

Shortcut is easy to use but very powerful, and has a clean, intuitive interface. It offers a wide range of features, including project planning, task management, and collaboration tools. The software integrates well with other tools, such as Slack.

The per-user price is a bit steep if you need access to all of Shortcut's features.

I think the best part of Clubhouse is the robust API that can allow a dev team to add or complement to the existing platform. Clubhouse seems designed for teams focusing on a product or a small portfolio of similar products or complimentary features. It does not seem designed for a consulting or agency style development shop.

Clubhouse is lacking in a number of areas that should be expected features in agile project management software. Completion dates are buried, no project budgeting or hourly rates, no invoicing or adding expenses, time tracking, resource management, personal task lists, custom fields, dependencies. It also seemed overwhelming to get set up and running.

It's very easy to use. I have used other similar software for project management in the Agile process, and this has all the best needed features without all the complexity. Just the right amount of features to make our team productive and integrate with other tools. Our entire team really enjoys how it works, and planning is simple with how we use project, epics, and milestones. Also the price for our small team is great for our small growing company.

Some of the integrations with 3rd party tools like slack are not fully flushed out and I wish could be a little more granular. There have also been a couple of occasions where it wasn't clear on generating some report data for a very specific

The software is simple enough for our entire team to use efficiently, but still flexible enough to meet our workflow.

The reporting capabilities are very bare bones and not very useful. We ended up creating a script to pull data from the API into a third party database to run reports and analytics against.

- high level of customization without feeling bulky - integration w/ Slack, GitHub, etc. - interface options --> Status pages for standups and Dashboard for personal organization were huge draws

- have occasionally had a hard time finding where to set filters/statuses, but that hasn't happened lately

As a growth marketer who really enjoys working in an agile environment, I realize I need tools that are not as overly complex to understand, as sometimes it requires bringing in individuals who have never worked in an agile environment. Clubhouse is easy to use while not sacrificing the required structures for agile environments.

I got used to other, more complicated software before adopting Clubhouse. This means that I do miss some of the reporting features offered by other competitors. Clubhouse does offer more basic reporting, but I loved the higher complexity of Jira's reporting. I also don't like that you can't necessarily flag items in the story board nor have multiple swimlanes for Epic organization. However, I have adjusted to this fine overtime and I think that never used those features before won't have a need for them necessarily.

The value for money, the easy use and the philosophy behind it

Getting the right search results is sometimes difficult

Clubhouse is amazing : it's an innovative project management software very easy to use and very easy to deploy.

Some features are missing in Clubhouse. It's a shame because the software is very good. The price is a bit high, but would be justified if the missing features were added.

I love how intuitive and easy to use the software is. The pricing is great if you're a team of less than 10.

What I don't like is that it gets very expensive once you are a team of 11 or more. For startups, this is just not a feasible price. However, if you're a team of 10 or less, it's very reasonable and feasible.

It's easy to use and makes tracking of tasks super easy.

There's no color coding system so can't differentiate between a hot priority and low priority

The cost of the software was so low in relation to the others in the market and you get so much out of the application it’s unbelievable.

There is no invoicing or tracking time so this was a bit of a turn off for me if this feature is upgraded the overall experience would be top notch

It has a lot of features to track tasks and project development.

Its expensive when having too much users on your team.

User friendly, ease of use, value for money

Sometimes it takes a lot of time to load

Epics and stories are easy to manage and prioritize.

Dashboard, just like with other similar systems, can get a bit cluttered.

Clubhouse has a low barrier to entry--new users pick up on it right away. While powerful and robust, information is organized and presented in a simple and elegant way. The webinars were very helpful in getting the most out of Clubhouse, and I look forward seeing their roadmap unfold.

There is nothing that I miss from previous ticketing systems.

Shortcut is easy to use, easy to organize, and low effort for my dev team. I like that it also syncs with Git, though, I've not implemented that feature yet.

Sometimes it's hard to remember where less often used features are.

It offers the ability to keep it simple but go deep if you want. Both offer value.

If you go deep it starts to get clunky.