Conga Document Generation vs Copyleaks Comparison

Easy to use, scans the whole document, shows you different colors for different levels of plagiarisam

Takes some time until the document is fully uploaded

Hello Sara, Thank you for leaving a review about Copyleaks on Capterra! We are so happy that you are enjoying using our product. We would love to feature your review on our main website, copyleaks.com. However, we would need a slightly more elaborate write-up (a paragraph or so). If you think you could spare some time and would be willing to write that, please let us know, and we'll send you some information about the details of how it could be written. We are looking forward to hearing from you. Team, Copyleaks

The side-by-side document reviewing panes.

The upload functionality for putting the data into the system.

It is excellent in reviewing documents for plagiarism.

Takes a long time to review a document and indicate the results.

It was easy to upload the document I needed to scan. It was also very easy to set up an account. The document was scanned quickly and I was able to share my results with my professor with no issues.

I had never used it before so it was a slight learning curve but I know now.

It's completely interactive with font style and more. I like how the text editor resembles Microsoft Word Document.

No problem with this software. I would like to see a percentage of plagiarism for each word.

It displays you the percentage of plagiarism than a text have and shows you the comparison between the evaluated document and the "original" one

It doesn't show you at least some of the documents or pages where the plagium was done in the free version

Using artificial intelligence, I am able to detect plagiarism quickly and effectively with no hassle. I like that the software can check all types of document types (including PDF), flags up content already published online, and that I can scan multiple documents side by side to ensure that any writing submitted to me is not plagiarised.

The only issue I have experienced when using Copyleaks is that the use of credits depending on the number of words being checked. This makes it difficult to understand how much checking each document will cost.

I like this software as it is quite easy to use. It helps me to detect any kind of plagiarism or similar words present in the document. It just takes a few minutes for checking a long text. As I am a writer, I found this site quite helpful for me. I can check mine as well as other people content within no time.

I am a bit uncomfortable with the prices. I only use its free version, but I would love to use its paid version if the prices were pocket-friendly. Otherwise, this software is great to use.

I've used Copyleaks while writing my master thesis and it has been an excellent experience. Everything from signing up, payments and the actual literature comparison process worked as expected. Having an AI checker in addition to traditional text cross-referencing definitely helped me to feel more confident with the results and in the end my thesis passed all reviews at the university. Copyleaks supports the important and usual file types and does a very good job in parsing PDF files, which, in my opinion, is the most important feature. In my case, I analyzed a PDF generated from LaTeX, and I was happy with the results.

At times, viewing the analysis results was a bit laggy on my quite powerful machine, which might be due to having a quite large document or due to the browser itself. Another thing was that sometimes it seemed slightly finicky with whitespace handling. Sometimes it reported very short fragments of general language as plagiarized. I do, however, prefer a higher false positive rate over possibly missed hits.