App comparison
Add up to 4 apps below to see how they compare. You can also use the "Compare" buttons while browsing.
GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.
Our commitment
Independent research methodology
Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
How GetApp verifies reviews
GetApp carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.
How GetApp ensures transparency
GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.
Rating criteria
Reviews by rating
Sumsub
Fraud.net
SEON. Fraud Fighters
Recommended
Clint B.
Financial Services, self-employed
Used monthly for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
Great product managed by a fantastic team of people.
Member Check helps me meet my regulatory requirements as well as assists me with the management of risk. It's easy to use and addresses my needs without too much work and time needed from my end.
Nothing to note. I like everything so far.
Sue P.
Nonprofit Organization Management, 51-200 employees
Used weekly for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
Ease of use once the user understands how it is organized (like "individual" and "corporate"). I love the single scans and monitoring feature.
Batch checks - the user needs to understand the excel file, fill it in correctly and what results following the scan does not look official (unlike the single checks). Also, it is not easy to click and see all the names that were scanned in the batch.
Shamali N.
Legal Services, 11-50 employees
Used daily for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
Very good customer services and user friendly system.
User friendly and results are understandable.
Sometimes, it does not capture all data. Screening hits are limited.
Simon H.
Accounting, 1-10 employees
Used monthly for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
Always excellent and swift responses to any issues
Simple to use and has global adverse research capabilities
Could do with Chinese name characters recognition
Alice N.
Law Practice, 11-50 employees
Used daily for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
The features are very clear and easy to use. No complains at all.
Didn't find any negative features for our specific use.
David Success M.
Information Technology and Services, 1-10 employees
Used daily for less than 6 months
Review source
Share this review:
Realtime data, wide range of watchlist that covers several jurisdiction,continuous monitoringComprehensive reporting
Member check doesn't support integration to local offline servers
Mohammed H.
Computer Software, 1-10 employees
Used daily for 1-2 years
Review source
Share this review:
We have been using this system for two years, but we encountered problems with our clients due to not capturing the name correctly for the Arabic language
Improve the accuracy of search in Arabic
Improve the accuracy of search in Arabic And To compete with other suppliers like acuity and wroldcheck
Sikhumbuzo V.
Banking, 11-50 employees
Used daily for less than 6 months
Review source
Share this review:
Excellent
Screening of customers - PEPs, SIP, Adverse Media Risk Rating and Due DiligenceOngoing Monitoring
I do not have any cons on member check currently
Christian B.
Accounting, self-employed
Used weekly for less than 6 months
Review source
Share this review:
So far so good :)
Time saving. It's UI is very user friendly and straight forward.
Still getting accustomed with the system.
Patrick G.
Automotive, 10,001+ employees
Used weekly for less than 6 months
Review source
Share this review:
Good adaptation to the product. Return on experience to be made after 6 months of using the tool.
user friendly, good results obtained during tests
Don't know yet. We will see if the sanction lists remain pertinent over the time.
Allan L.
Financial Services, 1-10 employees
Used weekly for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
Access to the system is easy, has very good guides to help you through the process. The reporting facilities within the system are good in that you can create hard copies as well as having the information stored.
Easy to use
Can't use successfully on the likes of Safari
Greg L.
Review source
Share this review:
The ease of set-up of this service and value for money are the strengths of this service. The usability is good and provides an appropriate amount of functionality to allows for users to identify members and potential AML/PEP issues. The data quality and configuration of the system are also strong points. There are very few instances, if any at all, where the system is down or unavailable. We are very happy with the product and service provided.
No pros were added to this review
No cons were added to this review
Sadra B.
Information Technology and Services, 11-50 employees
Review source
Share this review:
No pros were added to this review
No cons were added to this review