GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

Our commitment

Independent research methodology

Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.

Learn more

Verified user reviews

GetApp maintains a proprietary database of millions of in-depth, verified user reviews across thousands of products in hundreds of software categories. Our data scientists apply advanced modeling techniques to identify key insights about products based on those reviews. We may also share aggregated ratings and select excerpts from those reviews throughout our site.

Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.

Learn more

How GetApp ensures transparency

GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.

Learn more

CRIO vs Florence eBinders Comparison (2026)

Add to Compare

Compare similar apps

Clinion EDC

4.8

ResearchManager

4.2

Good recommendations?

CRIO

Florence eBinders

Overview

CRIO, the leader in eSource technology, is a health tech company helping pharma, biotech, research sites, and academic research centers streamline regulatory workflows with one system that delivers a single source of clinical data capture.

Florence eBinders is a cloud-based solution designed to help businesses digitize their duty binder workflows via a unified portal. The platform allows organizations to remotely access, monitor, and source review data from sponsors.

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Video & Screenshots

Pricing

Starting from

200

Per month

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

Starting from

No pricing info

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

User reviews

4.5

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

85%

would recommend this app

4.5

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

80%

would recommend this app

Pros

“Cumbersome tasks, such as charting are now streamlined, allowing us to become more productive and better concentrate on our patient population.”

Jodi R.

Senior Regulatory Specialist

“We have found their platform to be very user-friendly and it helps with every aspect of managing a clinical study at our site. ”

Jill H.

President

“A simple mouse click puts all investigators 'to do' items at his/her fingertips.”

James G.

Medical Director

Pros

“The structure of the platform has also been traceably improved together with its realisation within the notable user options, such as the eSignature function.”

Aryan G.

Business Owner

“Florence is an excellent example of how technologic integration helps improve workflows without sacrificing user focus- an approach that is challenging to achieve due to the increasing speed of development.”

Aryan G.

Business Owner

“In total, Florence eBinders is a satisfactory solution for documentation management, and its development adds confidence to users of eBinders.”

Aryan G.

Business Owner

Cons

“The recruitment module (or perhaps our usage of it) is a bit clunky with lots of required steps.”

Christine B.

Sub-Investigator

“The eReg function is cumbersome and not quite as user friendly as the rest of the CRIO software.”

Jodi R.

Senior Regulatory Specialist

Cons

“This situation creates inefficiency because the information has to be manually updated to reflect the changes across the system.”

Aryan G.

Business Owner

“Furthermore, the of download function has some steps that are not required in normal way of working that should be easier.”

Aryan G.

Business Owner

“For instance, if I ask for a signature on column "a," I won't be able to request a signature on column "b" until a is signed, so I have to constantly keep tabs on what was signed; sometimes signatures become "unrequested" and it doesn't state a reason why.”

Gabriela C.

Clinical Research Coordinator