GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

Our commitment

Independent research methodology

Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.

Learn more

Verified user reviews

GetApp maintains a proprietary database of millions of in-depth, verified user reviews across thousands of products in hundreds of software categories. Our data scientists apply advanced modeling techniques to identify key insights about products based on those reviews. We may also share aggregated ratings and select excerpts from those reviews throughout our site.

Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.

Learn more

How GetApp ensures transparency

GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.

Learn more

KnowledgeOwl vs Document360 Comparison (2026)

Add to Compare

Compare similar apps

Connecteam

4.6

Guru

4.8

Confluence

4.5

Good recommendations?

KnowledgeOwl

Document360

Overview

AI-forward knowledge base software built with customer-first development principles. Intelligent search, automated workflows, and flexible repositories that scale with growth and centralize organizational knowledge.

Document360 is an AI-driven knowledge management platform that empowers teams to create, organize, and share content effortlessly. With intelligent search, automated content suggestions, and analytics, it streamlines knowledge sharing and ensures easy access to critical information.

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Video & Screenshots

Pricing

Starting from

100

Per month

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

Starting from

No pricing info

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

User reviews

4.8

240

186

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

96%

would recommend this app

4.7

292

202

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

90%

would recommend this app

Pros

“As someone who manages knowledge systems at scale I also found the readership analytics really helpful and - unlike something like Google Analytics which can be utterly bamboozling - provided exactly what I need, and not more that I'm unlikely to leverage.”

Lucy M.

Knowledge Manager

“In order to get the look/feel that we require (standardized header/footer, and page numbering), I need to present my articles in iFrames.”

Scott P.

Product Support - Technical Writer

“Make your knowledge ecosystem reflect your company, rather than simply house your content!”

Lucy M.

Knowledge Manager

Pros

“There are also certain limitations around features such as API token usage, daily export size limits, and other usage caps that can introduce additional costs or operational constraints for teams managing documentation at scale. While none of these are deal breakers, improving flexibility, transparency, and turnaround time for enhancements would make the platform much stronger.”

Vignesh S.

Sr Manager

“Finally, the ability to embed media, add callouts, and structure content clearly makes it well-suited for technical writing, especially when you need to explain workflows or systems in a readable way.”

Himani B.

Technical Writer

“I especially liked its strong knowledge base organization, version control, analytics, and collaboration features, which make it suitable for both small teams and enterprise environments.”

Sumukh P.

Assistant Manager

Cons

“Collaboration for more than one user on a document is very tricky.”

Amelia H.

Technical Writer

Cons

“Another concern is that several smaller usability or product issues tend to get converted into feature requests, but without a clearly defined GA timeline, making planning difficult.”

Vignesh S.

Sr Manager

“We have also experienced some friction with features such as HTML export, which can be buggy at times and often takes a while to get addressed.”

Vignesh S.

Sr Manager

“Bulk actions, restructuring categories, or moving multiple articles are not always as efficient as expected.”

Himani B.

Technical Writer