GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

Our commitment

Independent research methodology

Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.

Learn more

Verified user reviews

GetApp maintains a proprietary database of millions of in-depth, verified user reviews across thousands of products in hundreds of software categories. Our data scientists apply advanced modeling techniques to identify key insights about products based on those reviews. We may also share aggregated ratings and select excerpts from those reviews throughout our site.

Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.

Learn more

How GetApp ensures transparency

GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.

Learn more

Travis CI vs Azure DevOps Comparison (2026)

Add to Compare

Compare similar apps

Jira

4.4

GitHub

4.8

Cycloid

5.0

Good recommendations?

Travis CI

Azure DevOps

Overview

Travis CI is a cloud-based continuous integration and delivery solution that helps small to large development teams test, debug and deploy codes. The platform enables users to sync projects with the system to test multiple libraries against different runtime environments and data stores.

Azure DevOps Services is designed to help small to large businesses streamline prioritization, release management, and portfolio management operations. It enables software developers to automate the process of software development using testing, package management, repositories, and more.

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Video & Screenshots

Pricing

Starting from

Per month

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

Starting from

Per month

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

User reviews

4.1

129

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

57%

would recommend this app

4.4

148

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

74%

would recommend this app

Pros

“It has been a very convenient experience, since I can easily see the status of my builds directly from the platform when logging in, it is exactly a good technical process for each build I need, it can be worked very easily in a group.”

James P.

Senior Software Development Engineer

“I love its ability to automate the entire process of building, testing, and deploying software.”

James P.

Senior Software Development Engineer

“What I like least is it provides limited support and have less customization options than Jenkins.”

Shubham K.

Cloud Engineer

Pros

“I mostly use the sprint planning features that helps me organize all the tasks and tickets and easily see the works of my team members.”

Sugam P.

Project Management

“This review synthesizes user experiences and highlights the key features, benefits, and challenges associated with Azure DevOps.”

Luis C.

software consulting engineer

“I love the fact that your git repos and agile task management is in the same place, it's very easy to link tickets to repo branches.”

Erik v.

Technical consultant

Cons

“we have a weekly recurring job that fails for linting reasons (but we still need it to run to get sonarQube coverage, idk if this is on us for bad implementation) but then who ever deployed last they get an email saying that the build failed. and we can only opt in or out from the whole thing and not just that type of builds.”

Ibraheem S.

FE dev

“Not so configurable: I can't come with my own VM ISO so I'm forced to download all prerequisite package every time for each builds: most of my credits go there... As I'm part of multiple orgs, it's hard to know which credits are spent where. ”

Charlie M.

Engineering Lead

“I'm kind of surprised it isn't as straightforwardly automatic to sort from GitHub, and there are some confusing elements to enabling it (and I don't quite understand why it's not more integrated with GitHub actions but maybe I'm wrong on that) but it's the standard, and automating test suits is crucial to good, maintainable code (especially if maintained by a community).”

Griffith R.

Postdoc

Cons

“Some pages (like retrospectives) don't auto-refresh which can be quite annoying.”

Erik v.

Technical consultant

“Developer ergonomics and ease-of-use are poor compared to common options like Github / Gitlab.”