NextGen Office vs Net Health

Fusion

Carepatron

ModMed

Fusion is an EMR for OT, PT, & SLP practices with features for scheduling, documentation, billing, insights, tasks, compliance, & more

All your healthcare work in one place: Notes, Clients records, Appointments, Billing, Payments, Transcription, Communication & more.

ModMed offers a cloud-based EHR system designed specifically for medical specialty practices including dermatology, ophthalmology, and orthopedics. The platform integrates AI-based documentation tools, such as ModMed Scribe with practice management features to streamline clinical workflows and patient engagement. The solution connects clinical and administrative aspects of healthcare practices through specialty-specific interfaces and analytics capabilities.

Owner operator

The customer service was extremely difficult to work with.

Director of Operations

I like the user experience, the customer support, and our account rep's knowledge and helpfulness.

Office Manager

We would appreciate more communication from customer support once a problem is resolved.

Achieve better clinical outcomes with EHR/EMR software from NextGen Healthcare. Gain access to state-of-the-art tools for fast, efficient documentation. The result: complete, accurate information, better coordination of care, improved diagnosis, and reduced risk.

Accounts Receivable

Activity Dashboard

AI/Machine Learning

Alerts/Notifications

Analytics

Appointment Management

Appointment Scheduling

Audit Management

Audit Trail

Automated Scheduling

Automatic Transcription

Availability Management

Batch Processing

Billing & Invoicing

Calendar Management

Care Plan Management

Case Management

Charting

Chat/Messaging

Claims Management

Claims Scrubbing

Claims Tracking

Client Portal

Clinical Notes

Clinic Interoperability

Code & Charge Entry

Coding Assistance

Collaboration Tools

Communication Management

Compliance Management

Compliance Tracking

Confirmations/Reminders

Contact Database

Customer Database

Customer History

Customizable Branding

Customizable Fields

Customizable Forms

Customizable Reports

Customizable Templates

Dashboard Creation

Data Discovery

Data Import/Export

Data Visualization

Decision Support

Denial Management

Document Management

Document Storage

Drag & Drop

Drug Reference Database

Dunning Management

EHR/EMR Integration

Electronic Claims

Electronic Payments

Electronic Prior Authorization

Email Reminders

EMR/EHR

E-Prescribing

Facility Scheduling

File Sharing

Financial Management

For Cardiologists

For Dermatologists

For Family Medicine

For Healthcare

For Medical Purposes

For Mental/Behavioral Health

Forms Management

Formulary Management

For Obstetrics & Gynecology

For Ophthalmologists

For Pain Management

For Physical Therapy

For Podiatrists

For Urgent Care

For Urologists

Growth Charts

Handwriting Recognition

Healthcare Compliance

HIPAA Compliant

Historical Reporting

ICD-10 Compliance

Imaging and X-rays

Immunization & Allergy Tracking

Initial Assessments

Insurance Eligibility Verification

Insurance Management

Invoice History

Invoice Management

Lab Integration

Lab Order Management

Lab Results

Live Chat

Meaningful Use Certified

Medical Billing

Medical History Records

Medical Terminology Database

Medication Alerts/Warnings

Some reviewers find NextGen Office cost-effective, appreciating bundled features and reduced IT expenses, and they say it's affordable for small businesses. However, some users report extra fees, unexpected costs, and diminished value due to overpricing and poor bundling.

Value for money

By industry, NextGen Office reviewers are most commonly professionals in medical practice (52%). The most frequent use case for NextGen Office cited by reviewers is electronic medical records (41%).

NextGen Office

Web-based

iPhone

Windows

Android

iPad

eClinicalWorks

Epic

AdvancedMD EHR

athenaOne

Oracle Health Ambulatory Suite

EHR 24/7

CareCloud

DrChrono

Basic

Excessive clicking required

sales support

The excessive tabs, scrolling, and button-clicking in the system's layout design are inefficient and don't optimize screen space.

70% of reviewers feel negative about Click. Some users report that completing routine tasks requires too many clicks, making workflows inefficient and time-consuming. Reviewers indicate that navigation is not intuitive, with excessive tabs, pop-ups, and hidden options. They say the need for repeated clicking to access or enter information frustrates providers, especially when under time pressure. Users feel that the design wastes time and could be streamlined for better usability.

Complicated payment management

59% of reviewers feel negative about Payment and Charge. Reviewers indicate that posting and correcting payments involves multiple cumbersome steps and lacks automation. Some users report issues with billing integration, manual posting, and difficulty handling adjustments or refunds. They say support for payment-related questions is slow and that additional fees for certain features or reports are frustrating. Users feel that the payment process is inefficient and can lead to accounting errors.

Problematic upgrades and updates

52% of reviewers feel negative about Upgrade and Update. Some users report that system upgrades often introduce new bugs or disrupt existing features, requiring additional troubleshooting. Reviewers indicate that the upgrade process is time-consuming and sometimes wipes out customizations. They say updates are frequent but not always well-tested, leading to workflow interruptions. Users feel that support during upgrades is inconsistent and that changes can be difficult to manage.

Slow system performance

Project Manager

This sometimes leads to issues like slowness and screen freezes when we return to work on Mondays.

76% of reviewers feel negative about Performance and Speed. Reviewers indicate that the system often experiences slow load times, lag, and occasional freezes, which hinder productivity. Some users report that switching between screens or processing tasks can be time-consuming, especially during busy periods. They say server outages and unreliable hosting further disrupt workflow. Users think these performance issues lead to delays and make routine tasks more cumbersome.

Persistent bugs and glitches

78% of reviewers feel negative about Bugs and Issues. Some users report frequent glitches and unresolved technical problems that disrupt daily operations. Reviewers indicate that known issues often go unaddressed for extended periods, requiring workarounds or repeated support requests. They say the process for resolving bugs is slow and involves being passed between multiple support teams. Users feel that system errors, crashes, and inconsistent fixes create frustration and impact business reliability.

Accessible webinar training

84% of reviewers feel positive about Webinar Training. Reviewers appreciate the availability of live and recorded webinars, which they say are effective for onboarding new staff and providing ongoing education. Some users report that webinars cover a wide range of topics and offer practical tips for daily use. They indicate that the training materials are easy to access and understand, making it convenient to learn at their own pace. Users think these resources reduce the need for direct technical support.

Customizable for specialties

85% of reviewers feel positive about Practice Specialty. Reviewers appreciate that the software can be tailored to a wide range of medical specialties and practice sizes. Some users say the customization options allow them to configure the system for their unique workflows, whether in multispecialty clinics or niche practices. They indicate that the platform supports comprehensive management of scheduling, billing, and patient records. Users think the flexibility to adapt to specialty-specific requirements helps streamline patient care and office operations.

Intuitive user interface design

94% of reviewers feel positive about the User Interface. Reviewers indicate the interface is intuitive and easy to navigate, even for those with limited technical experience. They say the layout is clear, with straightforward menus and options that help new users adapt quickly. Some users report that the interface supports efficient workflows and reduces the learning curve. They appreciate that the design is visually appealing and that essential functions are easily accessible. Users think the system’s user-friendliness improves daily operations and minimizes confusion for both experienced and new staff.

Supportive learning curve

85% of reviewers feel positive about Practice and Learning. Some users report that the software is easy to learn, even for those transitioning from older systems. Reviewers appreciate the abundance of training resources and the straightforward onboarding process. They say that ongoing improvements and helpful support make it easier to master new features over time. Users indicate that the platform’s design helps staff quickly adapt and continue learning, which benefits both new and established practices.

Streamlined practice operations

Company Director

The platform's extensive functionality allowed me to manage my practice's operations efficiently.

90% of reviewers feel positive about Ease of Use. Some users report that the software’s design allows them to manage practice operations efficiently, with simple navigation and logical workflows. Reviewers appreciate the smooth integration between modules, which reduces redundant steps and supports both tech-savvy and less experienced users. They say the system is flexible and adaptable to different practice needs, and they value the ability to customize workflows. Users think the intuitive interface and accessible tools make daily tasks faster and less stressful.

Clinical Office Manager

One of the least thing that I did not like was that it sometime duplicated the data and it was hard to merge patients.

Manager

We often find faxes delayed, but NGO support fails to provide any meaningful update during the questionable period. "

Admin

Sometimes the interface can feel a bit cluttered, and certain features take time to load.

Allows for employee tracking, care management, and has managed cloud hosting which is incredible for the price.

Pharmacist

Training with live person is limited, they only have a certain amount of time allotted and you have to pay for extra one-on-one training.

President

Improving our quest to eliminate paper would be helpful, but the current "out-of-the-box" setup is not going to minimize this too much irrespective of the specialty.  

NGO has been solid and but it needs updates to keep current with other EMRs/PMs in the industry. "

You can put the computer down, turn on the microphone, and focus 100% on the patient.

Owner

Everything from enrollments with the clearinghouse to deciphering claim denials is self service.

We have appreciated the ease with which the system can be navigated on both the practice management and EHR sides of the software.

Owner doctor

I paid a fee to get out of the contract early, and received very tense unprofessional conversations with the staff.

owner

It is nice to be able to easily see the note when sending a claim.

It is very robust. As we expand our clinical services, this is very helpful in terms of being customizable.

It took an incredibly long time to document on a new patient on their first visit."

Their new Ambient Assist AI scribe makes documentation a no brainer.

Medical records clerk

It almost seemed like it didn't have enough giggle or megabytes for the amount of medical records I tried to process on a daily basis.

NextGen Office software offers a comprehensive suite of customizable features, from appointment scheduling to billing and revenue cycle management.

Caregiver

When there are new software updates, it is a challenge because previously customized features disappear and have to be done again.

NGO limits other platforms from integrating using API.  

The Patient Portal is terribly unfriendly to the patients and staff alike.

We struggle to understand why NGO doesn't invest time into pushing this more open, but the "preferred partners" have access.  

It was still extremely heavy, but they allowed you to have templates which helped somewhat.

Processing time was very slow, it freezes a lot and made it longer to do almost anything

nurse practitioner

Most of our issues were left without a resolution.

One of my favorite features is how you can set access and abilities for each user and their specific role/responsibilities.

Then support (like all other support departments) move on because the problem is "fixed".  

Medical staff and providers also have to be retrained to get familiar with the new features / options.

dermtologist

Clinical and practice management EMR together and seamless integration.

Our team loves it, but it can be a deterrent for some.  PM-wise, the platform is simple to use.  

NGO reporting is great if you like and familiar with Excel.  

We had a responsive customer service experience.

Administrative Medical Assistant

learning to customize can be pretty complex and time consuming.

NextGen Office vs Net Health Comparison (2026)

NextGen Office

Net Health

Overview

Video & Screenshots

Pricing

User reviews

Key features

Integrations

Alternatives