Greenhouse vs ELMO Software

Moodle

Workday HCM

Lever

Employment Hero

SmartRecruiters

Ascender Payroll and HCM

Compare Greenhouse and ELMO Software based on features, pricing, verified reviews, integrations & more on GetApp. Find out which software is best for your business in 2026.

100Hires

100Hires is an applicant tracking system that helps simplify recruitment. With resume parsing, customization, integrations, and a sourcing tool, it's a user-friendly, all-in-one platform for hiring top candidates. With the ATS, users will be able to attract, interview, and hire top talent faster than ever before.

CEIPAL ATS

CEIPAL ATS is an AI-based unified talent platform designed for staffing firms, corporate teams, healthcare organizations, and GCCs. The system combines applicant tracking system (ATS), vendor management system (VMS), and workforce management capabilities in a comprehensive solution. CEIPAL ATS lets stakeholders streamline the entire recruitment process through AI-driven candidate matching, automated workflows, and integration with major job boards and HR tools.

ZipRecruiter

ZipRecruiter enables companies to post to multiple free job boards with a single submission and vet all applicants through simple-to-setup online interviews

Greenhouse is the only hiring platform you’ll ever need. Their industry-leading, AI-powered software supports every stage of the hiring process, from sourcing to onboarding, helping over 7,500 customers hire top talent quickly, consistently and fairly – today and as their business grows.

Activity Dashboard

Activity Tracking

Alerts/Notifications

Applicant Tracking

Application Management

Approval Process Control

Assessment Management

Background Screening

Billing & Invoicing

Boolean Search

Calendar Management

Candidate Management

Candidate Profiles

Candidate Sourcing

Candidate Tracking

Careers Page

Collaboration Tools

Communication Management

Compliance Management

Compliance Tracking

Customizable Branding

Customizable Fields

Customizable Reports

Customizable Templates

Dashboard

Data Import/Export

Document Management

Electronic Forms

Electronic Signature

Email Management

Employee Database

Employee Handbook

Feedback Management

HR Management

Internal HR

Interview Management

Interview Scheduling

Job Board

Job Management

Job Posting

Job Requisition

Mobile Access

Onboarding

Orientation Workflow Management

Pipeline Management

Real-Time Reporting

Recruiting Firms

Recruitment Management

Reference Checking

Reminders

Reporting/Analytics

Reporting & Statistics

Resume Database

Resume Parsing

Resume Search

Resume Storage

Role-Based Permissions

Search/Filter

Self Service Portal

Social Media Integration

Social Recruiting

Tagging

Task Management

Third-Party Integrations

Workflow Management

By industry, Greenhouse reviewers are most commonly professionals in computer software (27%). The most frequent use case for Greenhouse cited by reviewers is recruiting (75% of reviewers).

Users and use cases

The Greenhouse integration most frequently cited by reviewers is Docusign, a digital signature product rated 4.8 out of 5 for its integration with Greenhouse.

Integrations

Greenhouse is a recruiting tool with key features that include candidate tracking, job posting, and more.

Proprietary

Greenhouse

Windows

Linux

Chromebook

Web-based

Core

 Plus

Senior Recruiter

I also appreciate how Greenhouse supports structured hiring and DEI initiatives through scorecards and unbiased evaluation tools.

The integrations with other HR and communication tools (like Outlook, Slack, and Zoom) save a lot of manual work.

Talent Lead

Customisation of workflows and scorecards is limited without admin access or extra support

Senior HR

Overall Greenhouse Software is mixed reviews from using as an HR and as well as candidate login .I appreciate the company's culture and the software's functionality, others highlight areas for improvement in leadership decisions and user interface design

Senior Manager II. Talent Acquisition

I've used several ATS systems throughout my career and Greenhouse is far and away the best with respect to the data and analytics available. Whether you're in Talent Acquisition, HR or a Hiring Manager, the source data and ability to build custom reports allows you to formulate actionable insights and trends throughout your recruiting and hiring funnel.

Recruiting Supervisor

Greenhouse was a comprehensive ATS that had everything we needed from job postings and job boards, tracking applicants through the hiring process, scheduling interviews, gathering feedback and sending offers.

The features, reporting, end-to-end candidate tracking, and ability to collaborate with your hiring managers make Greenhouse standout above all others for me!

People Partner

Enjoy seamless access to candidate funnel information, clear and organized scorecards, easy-to-use referral links with progress tracking, and smooth integration with your HRIS (like HiBob, in our case).

Operations manager

It integrates well with other tools we use and makes scheduling interviews and tracking feedback super smooth.

Lead Technical Recruiter

I've also used platforms that allow me to create an email campaign that will automatically email candidates on the days that I choose, and Greenhouse doesn't offer that

The user interface is intuitive and well-organized, making it easier for our hiring team

VP and Head of Employee Success

I have to search a lot to figure out how to change, update or use a feature.

Recruiter

No master pipeline view—each job post is siloed. If you post the same role in multiple states, you have to manage separate pipelines for each one.

Some of the reports feel a little limited unless you pay extra for advanced features. And because there’s so much you can do with it, it can take a little time to get fully comfortable.

Intuitive pipeline view that makes tracking straightforward

Director of People Operations

I wish we could post to more job boards more easily and also that the remote or hybrid options and salary transparency rules could be a bit more customizable.

Talent Attraction Associate

It simplify a lot the recruitment process, also, the reports are very helpful to show the managers the progress that we do in the different positions that we have open.

Recruitment Manager

It offers solutions for most recruitment activities, and detailed reports. Although it sometimes has deficiencies in terms of aesthetics, for the company's needs it is more than ok.

Launch Manager

You can give different employees different permissions so they can access their roles and their tasks in the application/interview process.

Technical Support Engineer

Connecting to HR and checking referrals interview status , creating new job links all are hassle free.

I would like to have the option of customize statistics to the reports, not only create charts and generic statistics.

Team Lead

The customer service is attentive, always ready to tackle queries and offer swift resolutions. Plus, their reporting capabilities are top-notch!

Developer Assosciate

Timely reminders of company events and tracking of new opportunities and interview process going on for referred candidates.

Principal

I use Greenhouse for candidate screening.

The questions and answers that you can pre-populate are shown in block formation which can be difficult for someone like me, with ADD to read.

Employee Experience Specialist

I will not be using any other applicant tracking system going forward.

Sr. People Technology Analyst

Testing in production is disruptive, but must upgrade to highest pricing tier to get a sandbox (most other HR SaaS tools we work with seem to have alternatives)

Talent Operations Specialist

Greenhouse can/should do work on simplifying reporting, not everyone can easily become an expert in reporting, requires training and time, which should not be the case.

Some functionality is limited and relies on a fixed flow (the take-home test/form should extend beyond the scope it's in)

Chief of Staff

When searching for a role or candidate, sometimes it took a few different angles and routes before I found the information I wanted

Director of Operations

Everyone I've worked with in Talent Acquisition across three different companies loves Greenhouse, but a product this powerful and complex requires a reasonable investment in proper implementation.

People technology solutions manager

No unnecessary creation os accounts and credentials for tracking.

Self-scheduling lacks rules—candidates can book every available slot with no buffers.

Head of People Operations

I don't like that I can't see when a candidate responds to an email or that I can't "reply" to an email.

VP of HR

I wish you could see when interviews are confirmed and there was a better way to manage positions for workforce managment

Separate links for job postings so easy to sign post them to candidates

Director

Has really streamlined our hiring process- allowing many people to engage in an organized way.

Director of Customer Development

I took on a new role for a growing company and needed a solution to assist with the many tasks of my new role.

Sometimes accessing interview notes isn't super intuitive, but I'm not in the app every day so I'm sure I would get used to it.

Group Director of Recruitment

Best ATS I have worked with, from candidate experience, scorecards to reporting, Greenhouse has you covered.

Entrepreneur

Organizes and automates many aspects of the recruitment process, making it more efficient

Greenhouse has been a great tool for managing our hiring process.

Cloud Ops engineer

Helps to easily track and manage referrals.

Good product to track the onboarding process and refer to candidate interview status.

Recruiting Operations Manager

I wish there was a way to send interview invites directly from Greenhouse, especially onsite interviews.

Owner operator

My experience overall has been wonderful I have way less stress greenhouses reliable secure save and excellent customer service

Director of Talent Operations

The new profile interface is taking time to adjust to for our teams

HR Director

Integration with outlook for scheduling is a challenge.  

Candidate Interview

Reporting

Pricing

Interview Scorecards

Security and Access Control

Referral Tracking

Recruiting Process

Email Communication

Team Collaboration

High cost for small businesses

43% of reviewers feel negative about Greenhouse’s pricing. Users think the platform is expensive, especially for small companies or startups that may not need all its features. They say the pricing structure is inflexible, with high fees and annual contracts that are hard to justify for limited use. Reviewers report frustration with unexpected price increases and billing practices. They indicate that the cost can be a barrier to adoption, and that justifying the expense is challenging for organizations with tight budgets.

Frequent bugs and usability frustrations

People Analytics & Processes

Support is still terrible, they added some reps in the EU time zone but they are at a lower level than the ones in the US so most of the time it doesn't solve the time difference problem, I hardly ever get anything from the support that I don't already know, they mostly tire us with asking for endless links and screenshots until we give up on the problem.

55% of reviewers feel negative about Greenhouse’s bugs and issues. Users report encountering glitches, slow performance, and outdated UI elements, especially as data volume grows. They say technical support can be slow or unhelpful, and that frequent updates sometimes confuse users. Reviewers mention difficulties with data migration, document compatibility, and maintaining data consistency. They indicate that the platform can become cluttered and hard to organize if naming conventions aren’t strictly followed, leading to reporting inaccuracies and workflow disruptions.

Limited and unintuitive reporting features

39% of reviewers feel negative about Greenhouse’s reporting. Users report that reporting is limited to basic, canned reports and lacks customization options. They say generating custom or ad hoc reports is difficult and time-consuming, often requiring manual work outside the platform. Reviewers find the analytics clunky, slow to load, and not intuitive, making it hard to extract detailed recruiting metrics. They indicate that the reporting tools do not match the flexibility found in other areas of the software.

Streamlined diGital onboarding

HR Assistant

Once a candidate is hired, you can easily onboard them by instantly sending them forms to complete on their device (no printing required).

96% of reviewers feel positive about Greenhouse’s onboarding. Users think onboarding is quick and straightforward, with features like instant digital form delivery and clear task communication. They appreciate the platform’s user-friendly interface, which makes tracking onboarding stages and collaborating with HR teams easy. Some reviewers find that onboarding new hires or users requires minimal effort, and they value the seamless transfer of documents and integration with HRIS systems. They say the onboarding process is efficient and well-received by both new employees and administrators.

Comprehensive applicant tracking tools

CS Lead

It helps me to track applicants from application for the job to offering the contract

94% of reviewers feel positive about Greenhouse’s applicant tracking. Users say the system makes it easy to manage candidates from job posting to hiring, with intuitive workflows and customizable tracking. They appreciate the collaborative features that allow hiring managers and recruiters to comment and share feedback. Reviewers indicate that the platform’s analytics, automated responses, and candidate data tracking help them make informed decisions. They find the interface user-friendly and value the ability to monitor applicant sources and progress throughout the hiring funnel.

Greenhouse vs ELMO Software Comparison (2026)

Greenhouse

ELMO Software

Overview

Video & Screenshots

Pricing

User reviews

Key features

Integrations

Alternatives