GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

Our commitment

Independent research methodology

Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.

Learn more

Verified user reviews

GetApp maintains a proprietary database of millions of in-depth, verified user reviews across thousands of products in hundreds of software categories. Our data scientists apply advanced modeling techniques to identify key insights about products based on those reviews. We may also share aggregated ratings and select excerpts from those reviews throughout our site.

Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.

Learn more

How GetApp ensures transparency

GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.

Learn more

Apache Subversion vs Cycode Comparison (2026)

Add to Compare

Compare similar apps

Git

4.8

AWS CodeCommit

4.3

Gitpod

4.8

Good recommendations?

Apache Subversion

Cycode

(0)

Overview

Apache Subversion is a source code management solution that helps software developers create and control multiple versions of directories. The platform enables administrators to delete, rename, and copy different versions of a file on a unified interface.

Cycode is a cloud-based or self-hosted agentic application security platform unifying AST, SSCS, and ASPM for enterprise DevSecOps.

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Video & Screenshots

No screenshots yet

No videos yet

Pricing

Starting from

Free

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

Starting from

No pricing info

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

User reviews

4.1

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

39%

would recommend this app

No reviews

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

Pros

“Like GIT, but not Visual Source Safe (when we migrated), SVN gives the ability for many people to edit and change files and to merge the changes.”

Simon D.

Technical Director

“When I update a file, I just use "svn commit" to save the changes, and if needed, I can revert back easily with "svn revert".”

Derrick X.

Senior staff engineer

“Having come from Visual Source Safe in the early 2000s, Subversion was great in that it enabled more than one person to access and edit a file. ”

Simon D.

Technical Director

Pros

Not enoughreviews yet

Cons

“Also, its branching and merging features are not as advanced, making it more challenging for complex projects.”

Derrick X.

Senior staff engineer

“The toolset has a use case and if you venture to far away from what they envisioned, it is difficult to work with.”

Jerome R.

Software Developer

“I also wish this offered features that Git didn't have so there was a reason to use this -- as-is, it always comes down to SVN vs Git and SVN just isn't widely used in my industry anymore (seems more esoteric, and for our older projects, sadly, and wish we used it more).”