UiPath vs Katalon Studio Comparison

Table data extraction,web element detection,integration and system activities

To long scrolling to setup process flow diagram with separate ui window for each activities.

Uipath is so powerful and can be integrated with much of the application, it is so reliable, easy to use, Configure, learn, adopt, and manage

The software uses a studio , which should be installed locally in some system for development, if it can be converted to cloud studio then it will be so powerful and useful. Web studio is already present in uipath still it doesn't have access to local machine

The best thing that I liked about UiPath is its scalability, you can automate hundreds of processes and it's easy to manage all those robots from a centralized control room called Orchestrator.

UiPath Studio is built as a windows application and installation and maintenance require some technical knowledge. It's good to have a cloud version of the UiPath Studio.

UI automation is quite robust, the selectors are quite stable

I personally don't like the user interface of the UiPath Studio

Uipath Studio is very user friendly as well as no need of any powerful technical knowledge to use it.

Studio related and some important activities related video tutorial will added more benefits to it.

1. A lot of ai feature2. Open platform to integrate with lot of apps3. processing mining help to create use case for automation

1. Require a UI update to the studio2. Licensing management is cumbersome3. Web studio is very trivial

UiPath Studio is very easy to use and its features and activities are self explanatory.

Along with typing in activities or variables names on the Universal Search bar if the user is also given an option to right click on the element and get all the related dependencies in a window it will be very helpful.

Uipath provides a free academy for every individual to learn and bring awareness among the tool and it's uses. The video classes and tests will provide ease of understanding. The scraping wizards and excels automations help in mimicking daily time taking tasks. Over all Uipath is easy to handle and user friendly. An individual with no coding knowledge can also master Uipath.

There exists no drawabacks with Uipath studio. But providing some more video classes in the academy would be helpful.

-Easy data scraping function -Good service and Support for Enterprise Edition -Email Automation -Easy implementation -Has many Functions and features -Drag and drop option -Easily understandable (workflows)

In studio some of the shortcut keys are not working and a few errors can be rectified like generic errors

Easy integration Effective Training modules Tight security

The real-time issue in the Ui Studio sometimes creates problems rather than that it doesn't have any such issue.

I like this tool very much because of easy to learn and implement, after implementation, we can save lot of human hours and cost-saving too.

in the studio, we have a library option the library package is strict or the lowest applicable version, because of this when library changes the package needs to change and republish again, to solve this problem we should have the highest applicable version as well while installing the package from the studio.

the user friendliness that uipath studio offers and the big community behind that backs every other member and new comer.

Nothing so far maybe the rate of releases but this is only because the tool is still fresh and there is a big room to improve it.

Extremely easy to understand and use the development and design componentd UI studio. No coding experience required Free community edition and certification

You need to have really good machines to work with UI studio. Executing the automations by UI robots takes up lot of memory.

It is very easy to use, intuitive and allows for FrontOffice and BackOffice. Is has a lots os ready to use components that let you automate a vast number of applications right away.

For big processes workflows the UiPath Studio becomes slow to develop (but not to run). Sometimes it crashes due to a large amount of memory usage.

1) Fast Coding... Complete Project very Quickly 2) Easy to understand UiPath Studio and its components 3) All Components are separate like UiPath studio, Orchestrator, UiExplorer for creating complex selectors 4) Easy to Integrate third party library 5) UiPath is having community forum and any member can provide solutions... advantage of this you will get solution in very less time

1) Any one can see code and change the code....No login authentication Only one cons I have seen so far.

The Studio tool: environment for development with a lot of components. Easy to test or simulate the process. Flexibility to use attended or unattended robots

The architecture and database requirements for Orchestrator. The price of Orchestrator Licenses.

Product is very easy to use, its just you have to search for activity , then drag and drop it. Very useful for excel, outlook and web automation. Uipath Orchestrator dashboard is simple and understandable. Type of License are very well design and planned. Its easy to integrate with Git, SVN and TFS repository to store the code.

Not reliable for Citrix automation, Some time studio gets failed to identify the selectors. No option to Import and export of assets from one environment to other.

UiPath is now a fully cloud based system. It is well architected, and access to tools and functionality is relatively simple, thus enabling teams to become productive and creating value for your organization quickly. UiPath Studio is a complete IDE to create automations, and has a large marketplace for tools and plugins. There is an active community, so finding help is not difficult.

UiPath studio is resource intensive. I hope to see better resource utilization in future. Overall UiPath is great solution to begin automating IT aspects of any company.

UiPath allows for robots to be built however you or the CoE seem fit with minimal hoops being jumped through. UiPath's inbuilt activities plus the ability to create custom ones allows for all manner of processes to be automated.

When debugging, some bugs in studio often rear their ugly heads leading to unexpected results. Furthermore, some errors are not as easily identifiable from just their code/message.

1. Citizen Development - Low code/No code platform2. Insight of Automation3. Document understanding - Extraction and automation of unstructured data4. End to End automation

The cost of the Product is more, need technical skill for RPA developer. Even though it has citizen developer they have depend on Uipath Studio for end to end automation

Support from the team is good from initial contact till final deployment. Provided OCR support without cost. The modules are functioning well. UI of UiPath Studio is user-friendly.

Licensing of the product is difficult. Documentation needs to be improved, otherwise requires support from Developer portal. Customization requires coding, it is difficult for non-developers. Implementation requires effort of no-technical team.

UiPath is the most complete tool available for process automation. It offers a great set of activities in Studio to develop workflows. It can automate web, citrix, and other applications. It offers a framework that helps develope more reliable automation. Also there is the Orchestrator where one can manage the digital workforce, manage queues and resources.

If you are using the regular Studio you need to have some knowledge on C#. If you're not used to the programming language it can become less trivial to automate a process.

Excellent support from initial contact till final deployment. OCR support is excellent provided for free of cost. The modules functionality is good, particularly UiPath Studio is very user friendly.

Licensing of the product is not easy to understand. Documentation is not detailed. It requires support from Community portal. Coding is needed for customization, it is difficult for non-developers.

This is a very extensive-complete tool that gives you everything you need for automations and even more than you expect. It's an easy-learning path that requires the minimum knowledge for start automating process. With UiPath you hand a world on your hands, just for you to set your mind and start working on making it real.

In the past the training videos were given with an out of date version of Uipath Studio, but that has been fixed and new versionings have been released and everything goes well.

UIPath has a very intuitive user interface, which allows people with little programming knowledge to easily "assemble" robots from pre-built components (activities). Also, the choice for VB.Net as programming language was very wise, as many users are not from the IT field, but instead had previous knowledge in developing macros in Excel.

The cost of licenses is discouraging to small/medium business, especially in developing countries. Also the licenses themselves are hard to understand. One kind allows you to run your robot while developing it in the Studio, but you are not supposed to run in production environment, although technically you could. There's also another one that only use to run the robots, but technically you can use it with the Studio for development (except for the Debugging functionality).

Wow, 1. Free evaluation licensing, 2. ROI on investment 3. Object repository capaibilities like QTP, totally missing in selenium 4. Frameworks seem to be there, all qa models in software testing have frameworks, you will also get there soon.

Cons: Sorry to say, no market in 50BN US $ Software automation market in 2017 AD. 2. Nobody is giving any certification in Selenium unlike QTP, yet top R&D countries like USA, India, UK, Australia, Israel, Canda, and Japan maybe will go after selenium 3. If a software SDET, QA DEv or automation engineer is looking for an SAP type career it has ended, QTP is no more. For mobile markets open...

Read more