GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

Our commitment

Independent research methodology

Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.

Learn more

Verified user reviews

GetApp maintains a proprietary database of millions of in-depth, verified user reviews across thousands of products in hundreds of software categories. Our data scientists apply advanced modeling techniques to identify key insights about products based on those reviews. We may also share aggregated ratings and select excerpts from those reviews throughout our site.

Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.

Learn more

How GetApp ensures transparency

GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.

Learn more

ATLAS.ti vs Delve Comparison (2026)

Add to Compare

Compare similar apps

Tableau

4.6

Displayr

4.8

Good recommendations?

ATLAS.ti

Delve

Overview

ATLAS.ti is a qualitative data analysis platform, which allows businesses to analyze content including text, graphics, audio, and video for quality. The platform can be deployed in the cloud or on-premise using Windows, Mac, Android, or iOS devices.

Delve is a qualitative data analysis platform that helps ethnographic researchers, focus groups, and social scientists perform analysis for research projects and interview transcripts. Users can code sentences, phrases, or paragraphs from submitted transcripts and categorize highlighted quotes.

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Video & Screenshots

No videos yet

Pricing

Starting from

/user

Per month

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

Starting from

/user

Per month

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

User reviews

4.7

142

115

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

89%

would recommend this app

4.9

205

186

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

99%

would recommend this app

Pros

“So when you type, and push spacebar, the video recording starts to play, pauses, starts to play again, pauses.”

Billie v.

Student

“In order to find this, you have to close out of it and look for the settings in the overall project overview.”

Alexander K.

Researcher

“The ability to code and annotate my research material has been a game-changer, making it easier to identify patterns, themes, and connections within my data.”

Jenny G.

PhD Student and Business Owner

Pros

“I used a particular qualitiative methodology that required the transcripts to be divided into smaller sections ( "meaning units") as a first step and then paraphrased or "transformed".”

Rob L.

Consultant

“The data analysis tools at the back end - once my intitial analysis was done was so wonderful and many of these tools have appeared in my final product.”

Tim U.

Education Officer

“Exporting data to Excel or CSV files makes it easy to then triangulate between cases, codes, transcripts and participants.”

Eric L.

Researcher

Cons

“Terrible, frustrating, slow, hiccup, non customizable, non field tested, fast coded (not compact) program, that sabotages your work, workflow, for exactly that basic elemental work you have to do in social qualitative research: transcribing and coding.”

Billie v.

Student

“Cannot really work on different computers, because you have to make sure it's uploaded and since it doesn't do that automatically, if you forget to save and manually upload again, you're screwed.”

Alexander K.

Researcher

“Again, the decision to not put files into folders makes it much more difficult to find the documents you want.”

Alexander K.

Researcher

Cons

“I tried using the AI feature and did not find that it gave me a lot of assistance since it only used "some" of the coding and made choices and inferences I did not agree with.”

Eric L.

Researcher

“However, I faced some difficulty when trying to view and navigate my project, which led me to create multiple projects before I could locate mine.”

Rahaf M.

Math Teacher

“However, it is technically annoying to code this in the UI, so I understand that it might not be worth it as a feature.”