GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

Our commitment

Independent research methodology

Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.

Learn more

Verified user reviews

GetApp maintains a proprietary database of millions of in-depth, verified user reviews across thousands of products in hundreds of software categories. Our data scientists apply advanced modeling techniques to identify key insights about products based on those reviews. We may also share aggregated ratings and select excerpts from those reviews throughout our site.

Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.

Learn more

How GetApp ensures transparency

GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.

Learn more

Greenhouse vs Lever Comparison (2026)

Add to Compare

Compare similar apps

100Hires

4.9

micro1

4.9

CEIPAL ATS

4.6

Good recommendations?

Greenhouse

Lever

Overview

Greenhouse is the Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem, bringing employers and job seekers together in one place to make hiring work for everyone in the AI era. With sourcing, interviewing and ATS solutions, you can run every stage of hiring with security, governance and responsible AI built-in.

Intentionally designed with every hiring stakeholder in mind, Lever is a collaborative ATS that powers true talent engagement.

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Video & Screenshots

Pricing

Starting from

No pricing info

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

Starting from

No pricing info

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

User reviews

4.5

765

450

260

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

78%

would recommend this app

4.6

654

419

193

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

81%

would recommend this app

Pros

“For a team like ours at Built, currently moving to a 65% strategic/35% reactive split, we find ourselves having to build external AI orchestration or buy third-party tools to handle what should be native: high-volume fraud prevention, complex auto-scheduling, and bulk workflow efficiency.”

Ashley G.

Senior Talent Partner

“The ability to build specific role scorecards ensures we maintain a high bar for talent even as we scale.”

Ashley G.

Senior Talent Partner

“It is quite pricey and a bit difficult for our hiring model, we have a unique model which our employee numbers fluctuate.”

Tracy W.

Talent Acquisition Lead

Pros

“The LI integration works smoothly in practice, and the in-app support chat is useful for resolving small, tactical questions w/o slowing the team down.”

Samanta J.

Head of Talent Acquisition

“Support staff has been great, lightweight ATS that covers everything you want 1) Candidate and Job management, sourcing, integration with email/calendar, and sequencing emails”

Evan P.

Recruiter

“Pricing can also be a constraint for smaller or earlier-stage teams. While the core product is strong, some advanced capabilities, particularly around reporting, come at an additional cost that may not be accessible to all teams, like ours.”

Samanta J.

Head of Talent Acquisition

Cons

“It takes a lot of manual effort to set up a job properly, or to do something as simple as pulling up a job description, and its internal reporting often requires exporting data to Excel to get real insights.”

Ashley G.

Senior Talent Partner

“Automation Gaps: Native scheduling still lacks the complexity needed for an AI-native function, currently consuming 1,000–1,700 hours of team capacity annually.”

Ashley G.

Senior Talent Partner

“Additionally, the resume parsing was not always accurate, which sometimes required manual corrections and added extra time to the hiring process.”

Nikhil C.

Recruitment Partner

Cons

“That limits us for using it for construction industry and we are missing for access to contractors data bases.”

Andrii L.

Senior strategist

“The site itself seemed a bit dated and lacked the customization that our team required when it came to scheduling.”

Susan N.

Sr. HR Specialist