GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

Our commitment

Independent research methodology

Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.

Learn more

Verified user reviews

GetApp maintains a proprietary database of millions of in-depth, verified user reviews across thousands of products in hundreds of software categories. Our data scientists apply advanced modeling techniques to identify key insights about products based on those reviews. We may also share aggregated ratings and select excerpts from those reviews throughout our site.

Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.

Learn more

How GetApp ensures transparency

GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.

Learn more

Evalato vs Zealous Comparison (2026)

Add to Compare

Compare similar apps

OpenWater

4.6

Award Force

4.8

Good recommendations?

Evalato

Zealous

Overview

Evalato is a next-gen awards management software to collect, review and manage entries for awards competitions, contests, nominations, prizes and more.

🏆 Zealous is an online contest management system built to save everyone time and grow your contests. Securely collect, store and analyse entries. Automate e-mails to all stakeholders, sign up for a flexible monthly package, and cancel at any time. Perfect for awards, contests & competitions.

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Video & Screenshots

No videos yet

Pricing

Starting from

2500

Per year

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

Starting from

Per month

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

User reviews

5.0

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

100%

would recommend this app

4.7

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

87%

would recommend this app

Pros

“The intuitive interface and adaptable features make it easy for both novices and seasoned managers, ensuring a positive experience from setup to customization.”

Gergana A.

Marketing Manager

“Right from the setup to categories, payment integration, setting up of the applicant and judges portals - the whole experience is seamless for the admin, the applicants and the jury!”

Lavina T.

Director

“Everything is so intuitive: the set-up, the menus, the control panels.”

Dessislava M.

Communications Manager

Pros

“The simplicity of the admin interface sometimes falls into clunkiness, but the help desk is always available for any basic questions.”

Marieke M.

Partnerships Manager

“Once set up, it's been helpful to be able to take payments - or not, and review work in one place.”

Rita G.

Publisher

“I would have liked the option to divide the text into chapters or boxes rather than reading as one long section of text over several pages.”

Juliet D.

Director

Cons

Not enoughreviews yet

Cons

“Also with the jury allocation we were having some problems because of the fact that not all jury members entered the platform at the same time.”

Florina P.

Program Manager

“I don't know if these are things we would have been able to do or if we'd need new functionality:A couple of our questions couldn't be formatted by the person entering the category, so they just appeared as one text block, rather than separated with line breaks. As this was a multi-stage entry process, the entrants didn't get an email notification when completing their finalist submissions.”

Lisa H.

Marketing Co-ordinator

“we are nature conservation organisation and we couldn't fill out some of the information as we would wish to. ”

Neza P.

Dam Removal Europe Network manager