GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

Our commitment

Independent research methodology

Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.

Learn more

Verified user reviews

GetApp maintains a proprietary database of millions of in-depth, verified user reviews across thousands of products in hundreds of software categories. Our data scientists apply advanced modeling techniques to identify key insights about products based on those reviews. We may also share aggregated ratings and select excerpts from those reviews throughout our site.

Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.

Learn more

How GetApp ensures transparency

GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.

Learn more

Isolocity vs testomat.io Comparison (2026)

Add to Compare

Compare similar apps

MasterControl Quality Excellence

4.5

KAWAK

4.6

QT9 QMS

4.8

Good recommendations?

Isolocity

testomat.io

Overview

Isolocity is a top-rated eQMS for all industries. Isolocity strives to streamline compliance through automated workflows that provide valuable insights to help our users make informed decisions.

testomat.io is a cloud-based or on-premises AI-powered test management platform centralizing manual and automated test cases.

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Video & Screenshots

Pricing

Starting from

/user

Per month

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

Starting from

/user

Per month

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

User reviews

4.6

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

88%

would recommend this app

4.7

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

87%

would recommend this app

Pros

“Some modules do not fully align with operational needs; therefore, paper-based records are still used to bridge these gaps and ensure continued compliance with GMP requirements.”

Tal N.

Head of RA and Compliance

“Audit reports are limited as would like a score assigned to results instead of pass/fail and escalating from a non-conformance to a CPAR is duplicating the information, it should automatically transfer all the info over.”

Joan C.

Quality Manager

“As a result, these are tracked through controlled manual processes to ensure timely review and compliance.”

Tal N.

Head of RA and Compliance

Pros

“I also liked the ease of use, the ease of creating bug reports and attaching them to tests (both automated and manual), the ability to connect CI, Jira.”

Bohdan O.

“In my experience, the best thing about Testomat.io is its great UI/UX.”

Nadiia V.

QA Engineer

“We built one a stable testing approach where manual tests created in testomat, converted automatically there once script is implemented, analytics and test reporting are working automatically once no-code integration is done.”

Oleksandr I.

Software QA Chief Specialist

Cons

“Some wait times were noticeable, and there were instances where pop-up windows could not be closed without using Ctrl-based keyboard commands, affecting the overall user experience.”

Ryan P.

QAP

“The user interface can feel a bit dated, which creates a slight learning curve when onboarding new team members to the system”

Cory F.

Director of Operations

“Some of the features are clunky, like the Document index doesn't sort in procedure # order, doesn't save once sorted, so every time you leave the screen and come back you need to do a re-sort.”

Thomas P.

Quality and Compliance Manager

Cons

Not enoughreviews yet