Jira vs Autodesk Construction Cloud Comparison

Jira is a very useful software both for agile working and for bug tracking I like most the filters. You can customize filters a lot

I like least about jira the search engine, it's not well working and sometimes you have to perform your search twice

Jira is extremely easy to learn and use 1)Supports all agile methodologies 2)Backlogs management 3)Issue Tracking 4)Roadmaps 5)Reports 6)Stories

One way life cycle User Interface needs improvement

You can use for Scrum as well as Kanban and perfect to implement Scaled Lean architecture.

Not directly connected with cloud service

Make it to work with any other tool, easy configurations.

Jira Server vs Cloud differences is an issue, you can do most of things with server but may not with cloud.

- easy to use - plugins - works on all platforms - mobile apps available

- jira cloud: maintenance hours take too long

Best bug and issue tracking system out there for teams large and small. Especially good for distributed teams.

Cloud hosting could be a touch faster... please :)

We like JIRA because it allows the owner of the task to create and manage the status of their own work with no more effort than sending an email, so the bar to adoptions is very low. As a product/process owner we can then passively create management reports/tracking via JIRA dashboards with minimal effort and manage projects from 1-100+ people and not have to chase them for status reports, its all auto-magical (is that a word?). We like the vendor/product for the following key reasons 1) The rich choice of plugins and flexible configuration, 2) The option to run on the clouds or locally, 3) stability, 4) the low maintenance costs and ease of upgrades.

Many key features are not available on the cloud due to limitation of plugins, Atlasssian should work with the vendors to get more plugins compatible with the cloud. We would also like to see the responsiveness of the cloud version improved.

Übersichtlich, einfach zu benutzen und tu verstehen.

Das es derzeit nur eine Cloud Version gibt.

I liked that it include a suit of tools to help support our SDLC and roadmap towards CI/CD.

I don't like that the mobile app only seems to work for cloud instances of Jira and the huge differences between a federated instance and cloud instance.

Very ease to access, dash board is efficienct reporting is also good

It should be on cloud to beat the competition

Jira offers high customisation yet ease of use. It is easy for reporting with the ability to build custom queries. The ability to load attachments makes it a great workflow tool to process issues, changes, etc in a large organisation.

It would be great to have restrictions on custom field names. If too many fields are named with the word status the main status field becomes hard to find.

- many integrations - connects seamlessly with bitbucket and slack - highly scalable - good permission configurations

- high monthly cost - limited plugins for Cloud installations (OnDemand)

It has all that you need from a project management tool, and a large number of plugins that offer everything you can't find in core product.

We use cloud variant and it is often quite slow.

Ecosystem Functionality Legacy handling

Features could be advanced/better w.r.t. azure devops Mature cloud compatibility

I can look at and track tasks im working on, and still see the bigger picture.

The cloud is super slow. Every task takes a few seconds.

custom fields ability to create templates of items

no ability to have product roadmap with the non cloud versions

I gradate the compatability of the methodologies that it has, the workflow engine, the integration of its activities, the search and integration of its results. It is also nice the personalization capacity that it has.

The dependence of the internet for its execution in the cloud.

The jquery is amazing to help fully filter support queues between clients. Kansan boards are very fluid too

The cloud version of jira can be very slow at times.

The fast that you can create, update, track, and manage issues (tasks, bugs, enhancements, etc.) in a single platform makes it a must have for project management professionals.

when extensive data , JIRA can be bit slow performance wise , plus user interface sometimes feels cluttered. But , having said that , its a wonderful , must have tool.

JIRA is extremely helpful for entire project development with it versatile integrations.

More and more free plugin's especially for cloud version can be added.

Have used this for quite a long time and it has all of the features you need to be able to track stories and issues. Easy to use for people in all positions. Lots of advanced features that take a bit of time to learn and apply but valuable once you do.

It's a little pricy. Migration from server to cloud can be difficult.

Ease of use and integrates nicely with our ecosystem

UI is cumbersome. Need to redesign the UI to match cloud standards.

Easy to use interface with tons of features to track tickets through the agile process. Good integration with the other Atlassian products as well as some outside of that ecosystem. Ability to restrict access to those that need it across multiple different levels.

A little bit costly. Migration from server to cloud can be difficult.

Customizable, User friendly, great metrics, stellar knowledgebase, awesome marketplace

Inability to integrate some add-ons due to On Demand (Cloud) hosting.

It's really easy to use, comment, create content and sections to manage all internal/external documentation.

When it's set on-premise it's not that faster as on cloud.