Autodesk Forma vs RAKEN

Jira

Asana

monday.com

Jira is project tracking software that helps every team collaborate to plan, track, and release work by breaking down big ideas into achievable steps. Jira offers features like task organization, work alignment to goals, customizable workflows, and real-time data insights to optimize outcomes.

Asana Starter Plan provides growing teams with project management tools to track progress and meet deadlines. The plan includes workflow automation features, custom project templates, forms for standardized work requests, and rules for routine task management. It also offers visualization tools like Gantt and timeline views, plus AI-powered features for status updates and project organization.

monday.com is a cloud-based Work OS, where teams create workflow apps in minutes to run their processes, projects, and everyday work. Teams shape workflows and projects, code-free, with a platform that adapts to shifting needs, liberates teams from manual grunt work, and connects teams in a collaborative work space.

With Forma Build in Autodesk Forma, a mobile-first, user-friendly experience helps improve collaboration across office teams and field crews. Eliminate information silos and keep crews building with the most up-to-date project documents.

2D Drawing

3D Imaging

Access Controls/Permissions

Accounting Integration

Activity Dashboard

Activity Tracking

Alerts/Notifications

Annotations

Archiving & Retention

Assembly Takeoff

Audit Management

Audit Trail

Bid Management

Billing & Invoicing

Bill of Materials

BIM Modeling

Budget Management

Budget Tracking

Change Management

Change Order Management

Collaboration Tools

Commenting/Notes

Commercial

Communication Management

Communications Management

Complaint Management

Compliance Management

Compliance Tracking

Conflict Tracking

Contract/License Management

Contractor Database

Contractor Management

Corrective and Preventive Actions (CAPA)

Cost Database

Cost Estimating

Cost-to-Completion Tracking

Customizable Forms

Customizable Reports

Customizable Templates

Dashboard

Data Import/Export

Data Synchronization

Data Visualization

Defect Tracking

Design Modeling

Dispatch Management

Document Capture

Document Classification

Document Coding & Control

Document Generation

Document Management

Document Review

Document Storage

Document Templates

Drag & Drop

Electrical Estimating

Electronic Plans

Electronic Signature

Equipment Management

Equipment Tracking

Estimating

File Recovery

File Sharing

File Storage

For AEC Industry

For Commercial and/or Industrial Electrical Contractors

For Residential

Historical Database

HVAC Estimating

Incident Management

Incident Reporting

Inspection Management

Inventory Management

Issue Management

Issue Tracking

Job Costing

Milestone Tracking

Mobile Access

Mobile App

Monitoring

Multiple Projects

Offline Access

Payment Collection in the Field

Permit Management

Plumbing Estimating

Portfolio Management

Prioritization

Progress Reports

Progress Tracking

Project Accounting

Project Estimating

Projections

Project Management

Project Scheduling

Project Templates

Project Time Tracking

Project Tracking

Proposal Generation

By industry, Autodesk Construction Cloud reviewers are most commonly professionals in construction (58%). The most frequent use case cited by reviewers is project management (49%).

Users and use cases

Some reviewers feel Autodesk Construction Cloud streamlines workflows and reduces errors, which they say offsets its higher price. However, some users report confusing pricing, high per-user fees, and limited affordability for smaller firms or students.

Value for money

The Autodesk Construction Cloud integrations most frequently cited by reviewers are: Revit (a 3D architecture product rated 4.7 out of 5 for its integration with Autodesk Construction Cloud), AutoCAD (a 3D CAD product, 4.5), and Microsoft Excel (a spreadsheet product, 4.3).

Integrations

Autodesk Construction Cloud is a project management tool offering key features such as managing multiple projects, file sharing, access controls and permissions, document storage, task management, and mobile access, among others.

Autodesk Forma

Web-based

Windows

iPhone

Android

iPad

Procore

Bluebeam Revu

Buildertrend

Revit

Fieldwire

Touchplan

Oracle Aconex

STACK

RAKEN

PlanHub

Virtual Design & Construction	

Preconstruction	

Construction Operations

Cumbersome and unreliable syncing

70% of reviewers feel negative about syncing, citing slow, manual, and sometimes error-prone synchronization processes. Users report frequent delays when uploading or downloading changes, issues with data loss, and complications when multiple team members edit simultaneously. They mention that the need for constant manual syncing interrupts productivity, and failed syncs can result in lost work or outdated information. Reviewers express that these syncing challenges hinder real-time collaboration and create extra administrative burdens.

Limited access control and usability

46% of reviewers feel negative about security and access control, noting challenges with user permissions, licensing, and administrative setup. Users report difficulties in customizing access levels, inviting external collaborators, and managing large numbers of users. They mention that the process for adding or removing users is cumbersome, and that the lack of granular control over viewing and editing rights can lead to confusion or security concerns. Reviewers also highlight that the interface can be overwhelming for new or infrequent users.

High and complex pricing structure

Senior Project Manager

Great for VC and BIM but the structure of the pricing model forces you into overbuying the less functional or optimal portions of the service.

58% of reviewers feel negative about pricing, often stating that the software is expensive and may not be cost-effective for smaller firms or occasional users. Users report frustration with per-user licensing, additional fees for certain features, and the need to purchase multiple licenses for team access. They also mention that the pricing model can force overbuying or make it difficult to justify the cost for projects with fluctuating team sizes. Reviewers indicate that high costs can be a barrier to adoption and ongoing use.

Slow performance and lag issues

71% of reviewers feel negative about performance and speed, frequently mentioning slow load times, lag, and crashes—especially with large files or on older hardware. Users report frustration with delays during syncing, model viewing, and document loading, which can disrupt workflows and waste time. They note that a stable, high-speed internet connection and modern devices are often required for smooth operation. Reviewers indicate that these performance issues are particularly problematic on job sites with limited connectivity or when handling complex projects.

Frequent bugs and glitches

68% of reviewers feel negative about bugs and issues, describing recurring technical problems that disrupt their work. Users mention glitches that cause crashes, data corruption, or incomplete saves, as well as inconsistencies between different device versions. They report difficulties with notifications, file management, and certain features not functioning as expected. Reviewers say that these bugs can lead to lost time, confusion, and reduced confidence in the reliability of the software for critical project tasks.

Efficient issue and progress tracking

90% of reviewers feel positive about issue tracking, describing how the software simplifies monitoring project progress and identifying problems early. Users appreciate features for logging, updating, and analyzing issues in real time, which helps prevent minor concerns from escalating. They find automated notifications, punch list management, and comprehensive reporting especially useful for maintaining accountability and transparency. Reviewers say that having a centralized location for tracking deficiencies and project changes greatly enhances quality control and workflow efficiency.

Streamlined field operations

94% of reviewers feel positive about field use, noting that the software provides field teams with immediate access to up-to-date plans and documents. Users report that mobile compatibility, especially with tablets, allows for efficient communication and decision-making on site. They value the ease of documenting field conditions, resolving issues, and ensuring everyone works from the latest information. Reviewers indicate that these capabilities reduce paperwork, increase productivity, and facilitate better coordination between office and field staff.

Real-time information sharing

Designer

I worked more or less with Autodesk Construction Cloud for a year and what I liked the most about this tool was the perfect integration it had with other Autodesk products, such as AutoCAD and Revit, thanks to this it facilitated collaboration and the exchange of information between equipment.

92% of reviewers feel positive about information sharing, highlighting the platform’s ability to centralize project data and facilitate instant communication among stakeholders. Users appreciate integrations with other software, real-time updates, and accessibility from any device or location. They say these features make it easier to coordinate with trades, respond quickly to client requests, and keep everyone informed. Reviewers find that efficient information sharing helps prevent bottlenecks, improves documentation, and enhances overall project communication.

Preconstruction Manager

Lacking functionality like able to add contractors, get the platform on ipad, make checklists, make company specific forms, mostly not in par with Procore yet

Estimator

The platform’s real-time updates and analytics help reduce errors, improve efficiency, and give clear visibility into project progress.

Resident Project Representative

I can even mark-up drawings and published changes can be seen by everyone on the project.

Architect

It offers better co-ordination tools for designers, and makes full use of rendering tools to be able to fly through models to identify clashes.

Project estimate

The platform streamlines workflows, keeps everything well organized, and makes collaboration much more efficient.

Project Manager

Overall, Autodesk Construction Cloud has become a staple in our organization's daily operation and has allowed us to grow as a highly efficient and functional management team and streamline our processes to attract a greater number of clients.

BIM Manager

Having real-time access to information significantly improves tracking and coordination among team members, leading to smoother project execution and increased overall productivity.

Owner

I switch form the primar tool for the Cloud because it offers more sharing and collaboration features.

Project manager

It is a fantastic application to deliver the desired output and improves the quality of the project at every stage.

Territory Manager

The takeoff/estimating tools within AutoDesk Construction Cloud are not as robust as the other solutions that we reviewed.

It set my company back a few days since we were not able to access our subscriptions.

Project Engineer

What I like least about autodesk construction cloud is the interface is a little more clunky/different than BIM360 which was previously used for same thing, but just needs some getting used to.

Special Project Manager

We are using Autodesk Construction Cloud Colloborate Pro licenses mostly for BIM coordination, project management, etc.

I used to have to keep physical plan sets for multiple projects.

Operations Manager

Auto desk is a great software and we love when contractors use it with large commercial jobs.

I often work with other offices and the cloud service is very easy to use and it can be used with many devices.

Although the platform’s outages are rare, they can significantly disrupt our operations due to our reliance on its central data repository.

Revit Documenter

Requires communication with the Autodesk Team to learn the software and the ability to remove unwanted Revit Models/ Projects.

To top it all of you will get an (lousy) email, but it refers you to a completely different(?) cloud solution off Autodesk. That what I told the customer service happened.

What I like best about autodesk construction cloud is that it is very easy to store and share documents across teams.

Abit of Lag when working on big projects which is understandable seeing as you are working on the Revit Model between multiple users.

Design Engineer

AutoCAD Architecture, developed by Autodesk pioneers, is a 2D and 3D modeling software with specific tools for design creation. Despite compatibility issues and potential crashes, it is fast, effective, and precise.

From creating estimates based on accurate takeoffs to effectively collaborating with all team members, this platform has significantly improved my productivity and enabled me to deliver projects faster and more efficiently.

Project Planner

Overall, very good; had hiccups early on but ACC has devoted more resources and server support to ensure that interruptions are infrequent and that user requests are addressed accordingly.

Draft'sman

More advanced project management features: While Autodesk Construction Cloud offers a robust set of project management tools, some users have requested more advanced features, such as resource leveling, risk management, or advanced scheduling options.

Its ability to streamline project management workflows, centralize project data, and facilitate collaboration among team members, can result in increased efficiency and productivity.

In addition, its 3D analysis and visualization function allowed us to have a clearer and more detailed vision of our projects, improving decision-making and thus minimizing errors during the design and construction stage.

Engineer

The software provides real-time data on project status, enabling teams to stay informed and take proactive measures to improve efficiency and mitigate risks.

It was such an bad experience I feel betrayed by them. When it is working correctly it is a nice program, however. When you have a question you get coupled to people with little to now knowledge about the program.

BIM/VDC Manager

I think that in BUILD the way the sheets are organized can be improved, recently you did an update on a way of organizing called collection, it's not bad, it has given me the way to find the shop drawings sets more easily, but after they are in the collection folder that I have created and I cannot take the sheets out from there again, you should create a simpler way to be able to locate the version set more easily, because it gets complicated when I have many, I take them out at least a week 8 shop drawings set, imagine there are around 32 minimum sets per month, it has been difficult for us on many occasions to find a particular set, that is, more than a filter is needed, so it is better to be able to organize by folders.

Autodesk Forma vs RAKEN Comparison (2026)

Autodesk Forma

RAKEN

Overview

Video & Screenshots

Pricing

User reviews

Key features

Integrations

Alternatives