GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

Our commitment

Independent research methodology

Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.

Learn more

Verified user reviews

GetApp maintains a proprietary database of millions of in-depth, verified user reviews across thousands of products in hundreds of software categories. Our data scientists apply advanced modeling techniques to identify key insights about products based on those reviews. We may also share aggregated ratings and select excerpts from those reviews throughout our site.

Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.

Learn more

How GetApp ensures transparency

GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.

Learn more

Medrio vs Greenlight Guru Clinical Comparison (2026)

Add to Compare

Compare similar apps

Clinion EDC

4.8

Jotform

4.7

Good recommendations?

Medrio

Greenlight Guru Clinical

Overview

Medrio is an electronic data capture (EDC) tool for clinical research teams with tools for capturing, storing, analyzing, & managing patient data during clinical trials. Medrio offers secure storage of patient data, automates regulatory compliance management & allows users to build custom studies.

Greenlight Guru Clinical is an EDC platform purpose-built for medical device and diagnostic teams. Run clinical investigations and PMCF studies on a single validated system, with predefined templates, built-in GCP compliance, and support from people who understand medtech regulation.

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Video & Screenshots

Pricing

Starting from

No pricing info

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

Starting from

No pricing info

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

User reviews

4.6

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

96%

would recommend this app

4.4

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

80%

would recommend this app

Pros

“This software is very easy to share, download, and view data even for those who aren't familiar with programming and database structures.”

Lilyana G.

Senior Biostatistician

“Also the data storage with back up and recovery is quite good.”

Sayanta B.

Research Engineer

Pros

“The platform provides a centralised and organised environment for managing clinical studies, making it easier to maintain oversight of study activities, documentation, and compliance requirements.”

Manisha J.

Research Project Manager

“Layout of data events, security features of eConsent (ie. two factor, audit history), and now how the data event reminders are email/SMS.”

Isaac W.

Clinical Operations Manager

“Unscheduled-event labeling: Unscheduled events are currently displayed as numbers, so I must open each one to determine whether it relates to a protocol deviation, medication, medical history, end of study, adverse event, or another item.”

Stacey B.

Principal Investigator

Cons

Not enoughreviews yet

Cons

“Access workflow: Having to request one access code to enter Greenlight Guru and then another access code to download data, even when already actively working on the study, adds unnecessary steps and can slow down workflow.”

Stacey B.

Principal Investigator

“unable to see forms from 'patient view'One of the biggest challenges I experienced with Greenlight Guru Clinical was the inability to easily view forms from the patient's perspective. When patients encountered difficulties completing forms or had questions about what they were seeing on screen, it was often difficult to provide effective support because I could not readily see the exact view they were interacting with.”

Leah J.

Clinical Research Practitioner

“The main challenge is that certain processes require navigating through multiple screens, which can reduce efficiency when managing day-to-day study activities.”

Manisha J.

Research Project Manager