GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

Our commitment

Independent research methodology

Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.

Learn more

Verified user reviews

GetApp maintains a proprietary database of millions of in-depth, verified user reviews across thousands of products in hundreds of software categories. Our data scientists apply advanced modeling techniques to identify key insights about products based on those reviews. We may also share aggregated ratings and select excerpts from those reviews throughout our site.

Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.

Learn more

How GetApp ensures transparency

GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.

Learn more

Greenhouse vs PyjamaHR Comparison (2026)

Add to Compare

Compare similar apps

100Hires

4.9

micro1

4.9

CEIPAL ATS

4.6

Good recommendations?

Greenhouse

PyjamaHR

Overview

Greenhouse is the Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem, bringing employers and job seekers together in one place to make hiring work for everyone in the AI era. With sourcing, interviewing and ATS solutions, you can run every stage of hiring with security, governance and responsible AI built-in.

PyjamaHR is a next-gen AI applicant tracking system (ATS) and recruitment software designed to simplify candidate tracking from source to hire.

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Video & Screenshots

Pricing

Starting from

No pricing info

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

Starting from

/user

Per month

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

User reviews

4.5

766

451

260

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

78%

would recommend this app

4.4

108

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

84%

would recommend this app

Pros

“Its LinkedIn and email integrations made candidate management and communication easier, while its dashboards provided useful visibility into recruitment activity and the hiring process.”

Flavia C.

Senior Recruiter

“For a team like ours at Built, currently moving to a 65% strategic/35% reactive split, we find ourselves having to build external AI orchestration or buy third-party tools to handle what should be native: high-volume fraud prevention, complex auto-scheduling, and bulk workflow efficiency.”

Ashley G.

Senior Talent Partner

“There does seem to be a lack of configuration options when it comes to the overall look and feel. While the structure and automation are strong, the customization side feels somewhat limited, especially if the goal is to adapt the experience so it better reflects different preferences, branding, or visual needs.”

Marie-Pier C.

Compensation and Talent Acquisition Manager

Pros

“Basically we used it for as application tracking software as i am working in a startup we have multiple opening and we required to know which candidate is better so we can hire the best.”

Rajiv k.

Full Stack Developer

“Everything i like about pyjama hr as we can post jobs on different portals in one click through Pyjama HR and we can get a short comparison sheet for shortlist of the candidate here we don't need to reach out the candidate .”

Aarti S.

HR Executive

“Additionally, the software is equipped with a convenient function for importing profiles from a diverse range of recruiting sites, saving time and streamlining the hiring process.”

Nirali S.

Human Resource Manager

Cons

“Greenhouse does not offer native candidate outreach sequences, which limits its usefulness for sourcing and managing follow-up campaigns.”

Flavia C.

Senior Recruiter

“It takes a lot of manual effort to set up a job properly, or to do something as simple as pulling up a job description, and its internal reporting often requires exporting data to Excel to get real insights.”

Ashley G.

Senior Talent Partner

“Automation Gaps: Native scheduling still lacks the complexity needed for an AI-native function, currently consuming 1,000–1,700 hours of team capacity annually.”

Ashley G.

Senior Talent Partner

Cons

“The only minor issue I’ve encountered is a lag when editing screening questions, only when changing the question type (e.g., from single choice to paragraph answer) quickly. If done slowly, it works fine, but when done too fast, it may cause the system to lag, and I have to restart the process from the beginning.”

Mastan K.

Recruiter

“example, if i want to download report of basic details (like name, gender, NP,CTC, mail and mobile number etc) of candidates who has applied, no such reports are available.”

Rashida B.

Senior HR

“Editing details for AI interview while on candidates page is quite difficult as while you move navigation arrow it navigates the profile and AI interview is being sent to wrong candidates.”

Sunil J.

Chief - Talent Sourcing and Founder