GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

Our commitment

Independent research methodology

Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.

Learn more

Verified user reviews

GetApp maintains a proprietary database of millions of in-depth, verified user reviews across thousands of products in hundreds of software categories. Our data scientists apply advanced modeling techniques to identify key insights about products based on those reviews. We may also share aggregated ratings and select excerpts from those reviews throughout our site.

Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.

Learn more

How GetApp ensures transparency

GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.

Learn more

Cove Data Protection vs Google Cloud Comparison (2026)

Add to Compare

Compare similar apps

N-central

4.2

N-sight RMM

4.3

Comet Backup

4.7

Good recommendations?

Cove Data Protection

Google Cloud

Overview

Cove Data Protection offers appliance-free direct-to-cloud backup for servers, workstations, and Microsoft 365 data.

Google Cloud Platform is a modular-based platform providing multiple build and scale services to businesses of any size within any industry. It offers tools for document storage, data warehousing, security key enforcement, app creation, API management, AI and machine learning, live chat, and more.

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Video & Screenshots

No videos yet

Pricing

Starting from

No pricing info

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

Starting from

No pricing info

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

User reviews

4.6

375

267

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

83%

would recommend this app

4.7

2.3K

1.6K

572

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

82%

would recommend this app

Pros

“The automatic agent updates and simple onboarding process for new devices have also significantly reduced administrative overhead for our team. While there is room for improvement in the recovery experience for offline or decommissioned devices, the platform as a whole has proven to be dependable, easy to manage, and well-suited for organizations looking for a modern backup solution.”

Ken B.

Operations Manager

“I especially appreciate the centralized multi-tenant management, efficient incremental backups, and flexible recovery options, including file-level and full system restores.”

Darin S.

CEO

“I like the completeness of the backup for workstations and servers, and the ability to archive things 30 days at a time, so I have a complete history.”

Rick S.

Owner

Pros

“It makes it easier to validate application behavior across environments, investigate failures with better observability, and support more reliable end-to-end and performance testing in cloud-based systems.”

Rakhi V.

QA Lead

“It is especially useful for validating system reliability, integrations, deployment behavior, and monitoring production-like workloads, although it does require a good understanding of the cloud setup to test effectively and diagnose issues quickly.”

Rakhi V.

QA Lead

“What I liked most about Google Cloud from a QA perspective was its support for stable, scalable test environments and its strong integration with logging, monitoring, and deployment tools.”

Rakhi V.

QA Lead

Cons

“That there isnt a centralized, easy to read page that shows the total billable count, broken down by each client. And that you cannot delete specific dates from your backup, you would need to delete the entire backup history if you wanted to remove a single file that shouldnt have been backed up.”

Eliot R.

CEO

“Not a huge fan of navigating the filesystem from the restore window, it takes a lot of clicks to get to the right spot and the window doesn't fit all of it, a closer facsimile to explorer would be great but obviously hard to do.”

Kyle M.

Network Engineer

“I'm not comfortable with the fact that their is no MFA on local device to prevent bat actors with access to change backup settings.”

Terrence L.

Member

Cons

“For QA, this can make root cause analysis harder, especially when failures are related to permissions, infrastructure settings, service dependencies, or environment-specific behavior rather than the application itself.”

Rakhi V.

QA Lead

“The learning curve coming from a MS background is incredibly steep and the difficulties with mapping concepts between GCP and Microsoft on-prem means that it's difficult to have high level standardisations and cleanly integrated workflows.”

connor q.

IT Team Lead

“File format compatibility between Google Docs and Word/Excel isn't always clean, and staff who float between both sides end up having to think about which version of a file lives where.”

Blake A.

IT Technician