App comparison
Add up to 4 apps below to see how they compare. You can also use the "Compare" buttons while browsing.
Learn why GetApp is free
TeamCity by JetBrains is a continuous integration software designed to help DevOps teams perform automated tests and deploy applications, packages, and containers. The project management module enables IT teams to track the status of builds, download build artifacts, configure workflows, and assign tasks to team members.
Typical customers
Platforms supported
Support options
Training options
Starting from
45
/user
Per month
Starting from
No pricing info
Value for money
4.4
/5
49
Starting from
45
/user
Per month
Value for money contenders
Functionality
4.3
/5
49
Total features
37
3 categories
Functionality contenders
Overall Rating
4.6
/5
49
Positive reviews
32
15
2
0
0
Overall rating contenders
shaik a.
201-500 employees
Used daily for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
Every enterprise business uses this tool for maintaining their services enabled and establish the best business flow. All the services that are being build via Mule can be available via team city to be deployed.Its features include build history, user management and system maintenance. Build history has excellent feature of holding the various build version that are deployed earlier.Use service messages...
The least of this software is there are some additional features required for the versions to avail across different enviroments like manual build configurations process can be avoided for the lower environments and UI part can be increased looking for new enhancements
Eric W.
Real Estate, 10,001+ employees
Used daily for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
I am able to successfully manage over 600 projects in Teamcity in my environment. Updates are a breeze and downtime has been damn near zero in the five or six years I've used this product. The build configs are super flexible however I've not used another product so I'm not sure how my experience compares to the next.
I'm not a huge fan of the experimental UI for some views but for other items I prefer it. I'm often switching back and forth between the two UIs
Prateek B.
Information Technology and Services, 10,001+ employees
Used daily for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
One of the best things about TeamCity is its ease of use and flexibility. Here are a few key features that make TeamCity stand out:User-friendly interface: TeamCity has an intuitive and easy-to-use interface that makes it easy to configure and manage build configurations. Its web-based interface is also customizable, allowing users to tailor it to their specific needs.Flexible build configurations:...
TeamCity is an essential tool for the project. Some of the features we like about TeamCity are - User-friendly interfaceComprehensive integrations with other tools and technologiesScalabilityRobust security featuresExtensibilityExcellent support
Resource-intensive (requires dedicated hardware and can slow down other processes on the same machine)Limited cloud options (on-premise or self-hosted options only)The steep learning curve for more complex build pipelines and configurations.
Verified reviewer
Computer Software, 1-10 employees
Used daily for 6-12 months
Review source
Share this review:
It connects well with other JetBrains tools.
It is not as popular as Jenkins so does not have as many plugins and the community using it is a lot smaller.
Dushyant P.
Information Technology and Services, 10,001+ employees
Used daily for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
The integrability is a major plus point, and it has taken away a major blocker of manually ensuring sonar and build validation is passed before PRs are merged to avoid code breakage. It can further see some improvement so as to make the process faster and more streamlined
Teamcity allows us to implement CI CD pipelines for PR validation, by ensuring sonar checks are complete and builds pass before a PR is allowed to be merged. It integrates well with our VCS, Stash (Bitbucket Cloud) to ensure a Teamcity flag is present and applied before a PR is merged.The process is reliable and consistent, and works for new repos and configurations as well
The admin panel is cluttered and hard to move around, with confusing mnemonics for different validation jobs. Access granting is also unclear.One major pain point is that TC doesn't allow manual trigger of first PR build, and the process takes a lot of time, reducing efficiency.