GetApp offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.

Our commitment

Independent research methodology

Our researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.

Learn more

Verified user reviews

GetApp maintains a proprietary database of millions of in-depth, verified user reviews across thousands of products in hundreds of software categories. Our data scientists apply advanced modeling techniques to identify key insights about products based on those reviews. We may also share aggregated ratings and select excerpts from those reviews throughout our site.

Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.

Learn more

How GetApp ensures transparency

GetApp lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. GetApp is free for users. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website.

Learn more

eMaint CMMS vs MPACT CMMS Comparison (2026)

Add to Compare

Compare similar apps

Fracttal One

4.6

MaintainX

4.8

Limble

4.8

Good recommendations?

eMaint CMMS

MPACT CMMS

Overview

eMaint CMMS helps maintenance teams improve efficiency and reduce maintenance costs with a configurable and easy-to-use interface.

MPACT CMMS by MPulse Software is cloud-based maintenance management software for work orders, preventive maintenance, requests, assets, parts inventory, mobile work, and reporting. Requesters are free and unlimited, and technicians work on a lower-cost license.

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Platforms supported

Web-based
iPhone app
Android app
Windows Phone app

Typical customers

Freelancers
Small businesses
Mid size businesses
Large enterprises

Customer support

Phone
Online
Knowledge base
Video tutorials

view more detailsview details

Video & Screenshots

No videos yet

Pricing

Starting from

No pricing info

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

Starting from

/user

Per month

Free trial available
Credit cardless trial
Free account
Subscription based

User reviews

4.5

432

249

154

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

78%

would recommend this app

4.5

169

105

Value for money

Ease of use

Features

Customer support

82%

would recommend this app

Pros

“I also appreciate how customizable the platform is, allowing our team to adapt it to our operational needs while improving overall data management and user requests handling.”

Delvis A.

Maintenance Planner

“Their level of support has been exceptional, from the dedicated assistance provided by [sensitive content hidden] to the responsiveness of their technical support team, who have consistently helped with reporting and system customizations.”

Eric S.

Spare Parts Manager

“x5 is missing a way to enforce naming conventions that should be added in where at either shared or site-specific level, rules for naming schema can be created an enforced. ”

Michael W.

Facilities Coordinator

Pros

“We appreciate how it helped us in keeping track of all of our devices and not relying too much on stacks of spreadsheets updating, tracking, monitoring, etc., of our devices.”

Joel S.

Sr. Project Manager

“For our campus, it made getting requests from users easier, plus the users were able to receive e-mail notifications depending on the status of the work order.”

Christopher B.

Director-Physical Plant, IT and Facility Planning

“Being using mPluse for 9 years, very satisfy with the work order, work order scheduling capital equipment and parts inventory module. ”

John B.

Biomedical Engineer

Cons

“I feel like several coding issues exist with the SWO entities, Importing, and exporting which leave me with the feeling that several patches upon patches caused the chaos, which I can only describe as an unfinished product.”

Brad S.

Maintenance Planner

“I believe this is a con just because we are still using X4, but i would say that my biggest problem with with the system is that as a admin i have to consistently adjust licensing for users via email chains whenever my operations team members move sites or are then positioned over multiple sites. ”

Peter W.

RNG Program Manager

“The reason this is a con for me, is not the program, but my limited time to fill the data templates out.”

Ronnie G.

Maintenance Manager

Cons

“ability for front end users who enter work orders to see all comments and be emailed when a comment is added and/or status of work order changes was promised to us but does not function. ”

Dan R.

Director

“That said, if the ability to view comments for the person who entered the work order request and the ability to email when status of work order changes isn't resolved, we will likely find a different product.”

Dan R.

Director

“Reorder list is not nearly flexible enough, needs to be able to be sorted by bin location and printed or exported to an Excel file.”

James B.

Facility and Maintenance Sr. Manager