App comparison
Add up to 4 apps below to see how they compare. You can also use the "Compare" buttons while browsing.
Learn why GetApp is free
Q. Who are the typical users of QuarkXPress ?
Typical customers
Platforms supported
Support options
Training options
Starting from
249
Per year
Flat Rate
Starting from
No pricing info
Value for money
3.7
/5
86
Starting from
249
Per year
Flat Rate
Value for money contenders
Functionality
4.2
/5
86
Total features
12
1 categories
Functionality contenders
Overall Rating
4.3
/5
86
Positive reviews
44
25
14
2
1
Overall rating contenders
Grice W.
Principal/CEO
Airlines/Aviation, self-employed
Review source
Transcript
Grice W.: Hi. My name is Grice. I'm CEO of a recruiting company, and I give QuarkXPress a three out of...
Kathleen M.
Design, self-employed
Used other for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
When I began using Quark roughly 15 years ago, I would so anything to try to avoid it. It was intimidating and frustrating and, at the time, only a mac program. I desperately tried to convert as many files as I could to Adobe InDesign because I was more comfortable on the pc platform. Now, I love Quark and would prefer to use it over anything else. Having a PC platform version really was the key in my eyes. With recent versions, Quark has become much less intimidating and more inviting to non-industry professionals.
Quark really is the best when it comes to page layout and typesetting design. The features and abilities far surpass other layout programs.
Although recent versions have been improving, Quark can be rather intimidating to learn and not the most user friendly.
Verified reviewer
Design,
Used daily for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
I can create my design projects just the way I want them to be because it offers many options and is easy to use.
The many options it offers for layout, working with type and images. I love the Collect for Output, get's everything in one place. Resizing pages when needed, the gradations, the HTML options are great. I have found Quark much easier to use than InDesign.
I'd have to say the cost, it's expensive for a stand-alone product. Because of the high price I am very slow to upgrade to newer version. Which makes for a bigger learning curve when I do upgrade.
Ale R.
Newspapers, 1-10 employees
Used weekly for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
Amazing we use it for years, but we have to change to more modern product can solve the current workflow of digital/print media
Quarkxpress was the standart for printing. we really love it, we use it for make books, and magazines. Is relative easy to use (not easy but kind that) and get results. If you go for make prints books, is amazing... but if you work in print and digital media... well is gonna be a pain.
The big issue is QuarkXPress dont adapt to the "new standards", like make books for prints and digitals with all the formats (epub, kdp, and other) for all the markets. So you have remake the book for digital, other products save that more time because offer a solution to that problem Also the pricing is very expensive, they should try to find another model In the last 5-10 years they lost the market because of that. I hope QuarkXPress get it because we love it
Verified reviewer
Education Management, 51-200 employees
Used daily for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
I used this software regularly at my previous job, and really enjoyed it. I was able to create beautiful advertisements for print, fairly easily. I was able to teach myself how to use it also. When it comes to design software, this is user friendly.
It is kind of outdated. These days, people tend to look for Adobe software proficiency. It is a great stepping stone to Adobe.
Chris T.
Higher Education, 501-1,000 employees
Used other for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
Until Adobe InDesign overtook the market, Quark was the king of layout software. If it weren't for InDesign within Adobe Creative Cloud, Quark would still be perfectly acceptable and user-friendly to meet layout and desktop publishing needs.
I like the fairly straight-forward interface and ease of use after you familiarize yourselves with a few tutorials and hands-on layout projects. Improvements and updates throughout the years have allowed Quark to still have a foothold in layout software, despite the Adobe InDesign market takeover. Being a subscription based service is a plus, since I don't find myself needing to use Quark as often as I used to.
The features and functionality simply haven't been able to match or overtake InDesign's capabilities. Doesn't work as seamlessly with Photoshop and Illustrator the way InDesign does.