App comparison
Add up to 4 apps below to see how they compare. You can also use the "Compare" buttons while browsing.
Learn why GetApp is free
Typical customers
Platforms supported
Support options
Training options
Starting from
30
/user
Per month
Starting from
29
Per month
Other
Value for money
4.9
/5
8
Starting from
30
/user
Per month
Value for money contenders
Functionality
4.9
/5
8
Total features
55
4 categories
Functionality contenders
Overall Rating
4.8
/5
8
Positive reviews
100
%
Overall rating contenders
Verified reviewer
Insurance, 51-200 employees
Used daily for less than 6 months
Review source
Share this review:
DBHawk allows us to centralize the access to all of our production databases, and to track SQL activities per user in a very secured way. this tool is much more secured and much more suitable than classical SQL clients to track and secure production data fixing activities.
- Multiple database platforms - Web User Interface - LDAP(s) integration in front of database access (users do not have to know the database user and password to connect) - Strong 2-factor Authentication - Connections and queries per user tracking (perfect for production data fixing) - Powerful SQL editor - Powerful dashboards - Queries saving and sharing
Nothing ! It's just perfect for our requirement !
Timotej M.
Banking, 501-1,000 employees
Used daily for 6-12 months
Review source
Share this review:
More users have access to the data in a much easier way than ever before. Dashboards and snippets are very user friendly. We save a lot of time since the application is web-based, we don't need to install the DB client software on each machine. User access control - we can easily see and control who-access-what. Great technical support. In case of any technical issue, we have received almost immediate response and fast solution. All databases at one place.
It is supporting multiple database platforms, hence we don't need to switch between several Database clients. We can easily create snippets and share some access to the NON DBHAWK users in other departments. It is great, that we have one platform, that can be used inside of our company as well as outside - when connected on mobile device (iPad) via VPN. System is fast and reliable, it keeps the...
since it is web-based, there are some limitations defined by the browser - if by any accident the user press REFRESH WEBPAGE (or F5), the DBHawk gets refreshed and you may loose you recent work. Or in case you are using iPad with external keyboard, it is a bit harder to navigate through the SQL code with arrows. We are dependent on the availability of the server. Running a SQL PLUS code on the ORACLE database is a bit tricky, to get a spool file that is generated by the query is not really straight forward thing, but it works.
Raynald M.
Used weekly for less than 6 months
Review source
Share this review:
Multiple Database Platform Support both SQL and NO SQL Robust Access Management Including 2 Factor Authentication LDAP Integration Intuitive UI All settings are configurable even logo branding.
Not configurable with IIS, IIS is used by a wide variety of industries and it is not going anywhere. Need Java SSL Implementation is complexe.
Stefan L.
Education Management, 201-500 employees
Used daily for 2+ years
Review source
Share this review:
We use DBHawk for administrating our Oracle databases as well as a reporting and data analysis tool since 2011. We mostly like the ease of use for our daily tasks like resizing data files, managing tablespaces or managing user credentials. The integrated schema and data browser helps us a lot analyzing data and finding errors.
No cons were added to this review
Robi D.
Airlines/Aviation, 501-1,000 employees
Used daily for 6-12 months
Review source
Share this review:
Good security as well as a single access point to multiple data stores.
The controlled access. The ability to create a fairly granular access account that is outside of the db security. This means the account used within the application can not be used to access the database directly. I also appreciated and needed multiple database access. We support relational and nosql databases, having one tool saves a lot of time.
Deciding on the access method was a little complicated. The added flexibility increased the complexity.