Greenhouse vs Breezy

100Hires

NEOGOV

CEIPAL ATS

100Hires is an applicant tracking system that helps simplify recruitment. With resume parsing, customization, integrations, and a sourcing tool, it's a user-friendly, all-in-one platform for hiring top candidates. With the ATS, users will be able to attract, interview, and hire top talent faster than ever before.

NEOGOV provides an integrated HR platform specifically designed for public sector agencies. The system streamlines recruitment, onboarding, performance management, and policy administration through a customizable interface built on government best practices. NEOGOV's comprehensive suite supports the entire employee lifecycle while addressing common challenges faced by government HR professionals, including compliance requirements and document management.

AI-powered recruitment platform that sources, matches, and engages top talent across 200+ channels. Built for staffing firms and healthcare agencies to reduce time-to-fill and boost recruiter productivity.

Recruiting Coordinator

There have been a few times we've had some issues on the technical side of things and it's impossible to get a hold of customer support or our rep sometimes.

Greenhouse Recruiting allows you to find top talent with ease and get more out of your CRM by driving engaging interactions at every touchpoint, eliminating administrative burden with automation and AI-powered tools and keeping everyone on the hiring team aligned – all in one scalable platform.

Activity Dashboard

Activity Tracking

Alerts/Notifications

Applicant Tracking

Application Management

Approval Process Control

Assessment Management

Background Screening

Billing & Invoicing

Boolean Search

Calendar Management

Candidate Management

Candidate Profiles

Candidate Sourcing

Candidate Tracking

Careers Page

Collaboration Tools

Communication Management

Compliance Management

Compliance Tracking

Customizable Branding

Customizable Fields

Customizable Reports

Customizable Templates

Dashboard

Data Import/Export

Document Management

Electronic Forms

Electronic Signature

Email Management

Employee Database

Employee Handbook

Feedback Management

HR Management

Internal HR

Interview Management

Interview Scheduling

Job Board

Job Management

Job Posting

Job Requisition

Mobile Access

Onboarding

Orientation Workflow Management

Pipeline Management

Real-Time Reporting

Recruiting Firms

Recruitment Management

Reference Checking

Reminders

Reporting/Analytics

Reporting & Statistics

Resume Database

Resume Parsing

Resume Search

Resume Storage

Role-Based Permissions

Search/Filter

Self Service Portal

Social Media Integration

Social Recruiting

Tagging

Task Management

Third-Party Integrations

Workflow Management

By industry, Greenhouse reviewers are most commonly professionals in computer software (26%). The most frequent use case for Greenhouse cited by reviewers is recruiting (77% of reviewers).

Users and use cases

Reviewers appreciate Greenhouse’s transparency in pricing and favorable price-performance ratio for larger organizations, and some users report cost-effectiveness compared to other ATS options. However, some users say pricing is expensive and inflexible for smaller teams.

Value for money

The Greenhouse integration most frequently cited by reviewers is Docusign, a digital signature product rated 4.8 out of 5 for its integration with Greenhouse.

Integrations

Greenhouse is a recruiting solution offering key features such as candidate tracking, candidate management, applicant tracking, and job posting, among others.

Proprietary

Greenhouse

Windows

Linux

Chromebook

Web-based

Lever

Workable

SmartRecruiters

Workday HCM

BambooHR

Tellent Recruitee

iCIMS Hire

UKG Ready

Zoho Recruit

Jobvite

ClearCo

Paylocity

Rippling

JazzHR

Breezy

Personio

Teamtailor

Core

 Plus

High cost for small teams

44% of reviewers feel negative about Greenhouse’s pricing. Users think the software is expensive, especially for small businesses or startups that may not need all its features. Reviewers indicate that the pricing structure is not flexible, making it difficult for smaller organizations to justify the cost. Some users say annual contracts and unexpected price increases add to their dissatisfaction. They report that the high price can be a barrier to adoption, and some feel the value does not always match the expense, particularly when compared to other applicant tracking systems on the market.

Frequent technical glitches

People Analytics & Processes

Support is still terrible, they added some reps in the EU time zone but they are at a lower level than the ones in the US so most of the time it doesn't solve the time difference problem, I hardly ever get anything from the support that I don't already know, they mostly tire us with asking for endless links and screenshots until we give up on the problem.

55% of reviewers feel negative about Greenhouse’s bugs and issues. Users report experiencing slow performance, outdated interface elements, and occasional glitches that disrupt their workflow. Reviewers indicate that technical support is often unhelpful or slow to resolve problems, leading to frustration. Some users say data migration and integration with other apps can be problematic, resulting in inconsistencies or manual work. They mention that the platform can become cluttered or confusing, especially with frequent updates or when handling large volumes of data, which sometimes causes errors or makes the system feel unreliable.

Limited and unintuitive reporting

Senior Talent Partner

It takes a lot of manual effort to set up a job properly, or to do something as simple as pulling up a job description, and its internal reporting often requires exporting data to Excel to get real insights.

Sr Manager of HR Business Operations

Reporting is another weak spot: it's limited in scope and not intuitive to use, making it difficult to pull meaningful insights quickly without investing a lot of time.

41% of reviewers feel negative about Greenhouse’s reporting. Users report that reporting features are basic and lack customization, making it hard to generate detailed or meaningful insights. Reviewers indicate that pulling custom reports often requires manual effort or exporting data to external tools like Excel. Some users say the reporting interface is not user-friendly and can be slow to load, discouraging frequent use. They find that the system’s analytics are not as robust as expected, which sometimes forces teams to rely on other solutions for advanced reporting needs.

Streamlined employee onboarding

HR Assistant

Once a candidate is hired, you can easily onboard them by instantly sending them forms to complete on their device (no printing required).

96% of reviewers feel positive about Greenhouse’s onboarding. Users think the onboarding process is simple and efficient, highlighting the ease of sending and completing forms digitally without paperwork. Reviewers indicate that communication about required documents and tasks is clear, making onboarding less stressful for new hires. They appreciate the user-friendly interface and the ability to coordinate seamlessly with HR. Some users say the platform allows for quick onboarding of employees and smooth transfer of information between systems, which saves time and reduces administrative headaches for both HR teams and new employees.

Efficient candidate management

Senior Manager II. Talent Acquisition

I've used several ATS systems throughout my career and Greenhouse is far and away the best with respect to the data and analytics available. Whether you're in Talent Acquisition, HR or a Hiring Manager, the source data and ability to build custom reports allows you to formulate actionable insights and trends throughout your recruiting and hiring funnel.

Director 

It's an amazing tool to keep track of your prospects, have the proper communication between everyone involved in the hiring process, and make the entered flow also easier.

95% of reviewers feel positive about Greenhouse’s applicant tracking. Users say the system simplifies tracking candidates throughout the hiring process, offering intuitive tools for managing job postings, applications, and communication. Reviewers indicate that collaborative features allow hiring managers and recruiters to share feedback and notes efficiently. They appreciate the ability to customize workflows, generate reports, and integrate with other HR tools. Some users report that the platform’s dashboards and analytics make it easier to monitor recruiting metrics and make informed decisions, ultimately streamlining the hiring process for all stakeholders.

Intuitive and simple interface

94% of reviewers feel positive about Greenhouse’s ease of use. Users think the platform is straightforward to navigate, with a clean and modern interface that makes it easy to find information and complete tasks quickly. Reviewers appreciate that even those new to the system can adapt without much training. They say the tool keeps everything organized in one place, reducing confusion and saving time. Some users report that the simplicity of the design helps them focus on their recruiting tasks, and they value how easy it is to refer candidates or manage hiring workflows.

Customizable recruiting workflows

Talent Attraction Associate

It simplify a lot the recruitment process, also, the reports are very helpful to show the managers the progress that we do in the different positions that we have open.

95% of reviewers feel positive about Greenhouse’s recruiting process. Reviewers appreciate the platform’s flexibility, allowing them to tailor workflows and automate repetitive tasks, which they say reduces manual work and increases recruiting efficiency. Users think the system centralizes communication, keeps hiring teams aligned, and provides visibility into every recruitment stage. They find that customizable templates and integration options help streamline hiring, while reporting features support data-driven decisions. Some users report improved candidate experiences and faster hiring cycles, noting that Greenhouse adapts well to different organizational needs and scales as teams grow.

For a team like ours at Built, currently moving to a 65% strategic/35% reactive split, we find ourselves having to build external AI orchestration or buy third-party tools to handle what should be native: high-volume fraud prevention, complex auto-scheduling, and bulk workflow efficiency.

Compensation and Talent Acquisition Manager

There does seem to be a lack of configuration options when it comes to the overall look and feel. While the structure and automation are strong, the customization side feels somewhat limited, especially if the goal is to adapt the experience so it better reflects different preferences, branding, or visual needs.

HR Generalist

We had an expedited timeline and it went amazing despite how constricted we were on timing. While communicating changes and educating hiring managers on this change can be difficult, all the hiring managers have been very excited about this change since they have so much more visibility on their candidate pool.

The ability to build specific role scorecards ensures we maintain a high bar for talent even as we scale.

Automation Gaps: Native scheduling still lacks the complexity needed for an AI-native function, currently consuming 1,000–1,700 hours of team capacity annually.

Manager of Recruiting

You need clear processes, training, and ownership to get the most out of it. But if implemented correctly, it becomes a powerful system that supports both high-volume hiring and more strategic roles.

The pricing makes it accessible, and for teams that don't need advanced reporting or complex workflows, it does the job without breaking the budget.

Additionally, some jobs were set up in the testing phase with one person as the approver, and it doesn't allow you to change the approver after it's been posted.

Manager Talent Acquisition

Love that I can email candidates and get feedback directly in the system and that it integrates easily with Outlook, Slack, Teams etc.

Talent Acquisition Lead

It is quite pricey and a bit difficult for our hiring model, we have a unique model which our employee numbers fluctuate.

Recruitment Partner

Additionally, the resume parsing was not always accurate, which sometimes required manual corrections and added extra time to the hiring process.

Sr. Coordinator, HR Talent

Applicant Tracking - making candidates easier to flag to move forward in the intervew process I think that is not as user friendly and take a while to learn

Associate VP of Talent Acquisition

Candidate satisfaction survey needs improvements for reporting and CRM, and rediscovery are weak compared to other tools.

Senior Talent Acquisition Partner

For example, it would be helpful if I could filter candidates who do not require visa sponsorship and review those CVs directly.

It's a serviceable tool if you're on a tight budget, but teams looking for deeper automation or robust analytics may find themselves frustrated

People Operations Specialist

There are opportunities to improve performance to better meet our expectations in terms of personalization and reporting capability.

Recruiting Supervisor

Greenhouse was a comprehensive ATS that had everything we needed from job postings and job boards, tracking applicants through the hiring process, scheduling interviews, gathering feedback and sending offers.

The features, reporting, end-to-end candidate tracking, and ability to collaborate with your hiring managers make Greenhouse standout above all others for me!

We don't have a talent coordinator or anyone in recruiting ops, meaning our recruiters have to do all the manual setup.

Candidates can self-schedule, which cuts down on back-and-forth and improves time to fill.

Chief of Staff

The gap is adoption — the tool is only as good as the discipline of the team filling it in, and it doesn't do enough to reduce friction for occasional users.

Talent Acquisition Specialist

We have a lot of use with specific questions from candiates and it would be easiest to add them ourselves versus having to do a workaround.

HR Senior Coordinator

One thing I noticed was that the custom parent fields are only limited to 25 options.

You need to spend time building dashboards or exporting data to get exactly what you want.

People Partner

Enjoy seamless access to candidate funnel information, clear and organized scorecards, easy-to-use referral links with progress tracking, and smooth integration with your HRIS (like HiBob, in our case).

Senior Recruiter

I also appreciate how Greenhouse supports structured hiring and DEI initiatives through scorecards and unbiased evaluation tools.

Field Supervisor of Inspections

Works great on the computer but you are not able to apply for jobs on a mobile device.

It would be nice if there was a way for this to be more easily monitored. As it is currently, it seems like a lot to trust staff beyond recruiters with.

Lead Technical Recruiter

I've also used platforms that allow me to create an email campaign that will automatically email candidates on the days that I choose, and Greenhouse doesn't offer that

They have a responsive tech support that quickly responds to help resolve issues.

The integrations with other HR and communication tools (like Outlook, Slack, and Zoom) save a lot of manual work.

Talent Lead

Customisation of workflows and scorecards is limited without admin access or extra support

Greenhouse is cost-effective and covers the core functionality you'd expect from an ATS.

Senior Talent Acquisition Specialist

Also, I don't have a place to put prospects unless I link them to a specific job.

Recruiter

No master pipeline view—each job post is siloed. If you post the same role in multiple states, you have to manage separate pipelines for each one.

Senior HR

Overall Greenhouse Software is mixed reviews from using as an HR and as well as candidate login .I appreciate the company's culture and the software's functionality, others highlight areas for improvement in leadership decisions and user interface design

We really like it - it works for our companys needs in regards to recruiting and hiring.  

This program has been very valuable to allow employees apply for jobs internally.

Director of People Operations

I wish we could post to more job boards more easily and also that the remote or hybrid options and salary transparency rules could be a bit more customizable.

This program is not very functional on a tablet or cell phone.

Recruitment Manager

It offers solutions for most recruitment activities, and detailed reports. Although it sometimes has deficiencies in terms of aesthetics, for the company's needs it is more than ok.

Launch Manager

You can give different employees different permissions so they can access their roles and their tasks in the application/interview process.

Greenhouse vs Breezy Comparison (2026)

Greenhouse

Breezy

Overview

Video & Screenshots

Pricing

User reviews

Key features

Integrations

Alternatives