One2Team Pricing, Features, Reviews & Alternatives

Pros
Performance = these last years, down time has been almost non existant. SAAS = enables us to work with other administrations and service providers without the network constraint of on-premise tools; Customisation = the ability to shape the tool as you see fit (but some prefer to have best pratices) Interface = it has come a long way since our first use over 8 years ago, with a cool slideboard interface and Gant type planning ability

Cons
The administration interface, but the administration process is robust.

Rating breakdown

Likelihood to recommend: 10/10

Pros
Saas tehnology is easy to deploy over the world in different entitities (no specific internal process to organize). One 2 Team software is not an expert software. That give opportunity to customized it easily to our needs Esay to use. Learning curve is quik.

Cons
Interaction between Planning and Slideboard should be more powerfull.

Rating breakdown

Likelihood to recommend: 8/10

Pros
I like that the system can be configured to meet specific business requirements and the user interface is easy to navigate.

Cons
The lack of ad hoc end user reporting is a drawback and the reporting functionality available is limited and somewhat difficult to set up.

Rating breakdown

Likelihood to recommend: 8/10

Pros
- Easy to use - Personalized views - Possibility to have real time KPIs based on the data within the application - Integration with third software, even if we did not implement if for now. At least we know it is there

Cons
1. Administrator perspective - Lacks a bit of automation in the configuration process e.g: adding a new item on all slideboards has to be done manually & it is very time consuming; Plus there is a lot of place for errors in the procedure - Lacks a bit of logic in some cases e.g: new button at the end of the row when adding a new item, which means a lot of clicks 2. User Experience - Gantt Planning module: - Not synchronized with the whole user experience journey; it lacks a touch of modern - The filters do not make sense and they lake logic as well - I consider this as the biggest drawback for O2T; We actually do not use it at all - Cockpits lack: - Possibility to display the graphs with embedded explanation in the graphs; Currently we have to hover over a graph to see the data. In the case of a Print Screen, we can not see much and the graphs are not explicit - Easier way to arrange graphs; Arranging them is really complicated

Rating breakdown

Likelihood to recommend: 7/10

Pros
I like its versatility, its ease of use and its friendly look for the final user. About the ease of use, the main points are the integration with our compagny SSO, the slideboards (global overview on projects for manager or actions for employee) and the timesheet (ARM) module. Another big asset is the very fast reactivity of the consultants during the set up phases of the tool.

Cons
The administration of the tool is not very friendly and intuitive (I have to say that I don't follow the official admin training yet). Clearly, a better integration with Gsuite (Gdrive in particular) is critical to avoid to manage various versions of the document. Integration with sale force will be also very interesting (currently we use the copy/paste method). The other issue is that the synchronisation is not immediate (between ARM and O2T and in a card when a date is changed for example). Last point, it seems that the tool becomes more "complex", less readable. What is the difference between the cockpit and the report management in ARM... planning and capacity planning are closed but not so closed... it is not easy for me to have a good overview of the possibilities of the tool.

Rating breakdown

Likelihood to recommend: 9/10